Gupta (king)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Gupta
Maharaja
Gupta
Gupta Empire
320 CE–550 CE
Chandragupta II horse typeHead of a Buddha statue, India, Mathura, Gupta period, 4th-5th century CE
Gupta (c. late 3rd century)
Ghatotkacha (c. late 3rd century - 319)
Chandragupta I (c. 319 – 335/350)
Kacha (early 4th century?)
Samudragupta (c. 335/350 – 375)
(Ramagupta) (late 4th century?)
Chandragupta II (380 – 413/415)
Kumaragupta I (415 – 455)
Skandagupta (455 - 467)
Purugupta (467 – 473)
Kumaragupta II (473 - 476)
Budhagupta (476 – 495)
Narasimhagupta (495 – ?)
(Bhanugupta) (c. 510)
Vainyagupta (c. 507)
Kumaragupta III (c. 530)
Vishnugupta (540 – 550)

Gupta (

Gupta dynasty of northern India. He is identified with king Che-li-ki-to (believed to be the Chinese transcription of "Shri-Gupta"), who, according to the 7th-century Chinese Buddhist monk Yijing, built a temple near Mi-li-kia-si-kia-po-no (Mṛgaśikhāvana
) for Chinese pilgrims.

Name

Gupta is not attested by his own inscriptions or coins, although some seals and coins have been wrongly attributed to him.[2] The earliest description of him occurs in his great-grandson Samudragupta's Prayagraaj Pillar inscription, and is repeated verbatim in several later records of the dynasty:[3]

Licchavi, son's son of the prosperous Ghaṭōtkacha, the Mahārāja and the son of the son's son of the prosperous Gupta, the Mahārāja[4][5]

The Allahabad Pillar inscription names Samudragupta's ancestors as Shrī Gupta (

1008 names of Vishnu, which suggests that it can be used as a given name.[6] The name derives from the word gup ("to protect").[7]

Date

Gupta most probably ruled in the second half of the 3rd century, although his reign cannot be dated with certainty based on existing evidence. Various estimates of his reign include:[8][2]

Political status

The Allahabad Pillar inscription uses the title

Kushana vassals.[10]

There is no doubt that Gupta and Ghatotkacha held a lower status and were less powerful than Chandragupta I.

Vakatakas, used the title Maharaja. Moreover, the Kushana Empire had already declined before the rise of the Guptas, so Gupta is unlikely to have been a Kushana vassal.[10]

Identification with Che-li-ki-to

The 7th century Chinese Buddhist monk Yijing, in his description of the itinerary of the earlier Korean traveler(of Silla) Hwui-lun(慧輪) alias Prajnavarma, mentions that in ancient times, king Che-li-ki-to (室利笈多) built a temple near Mi-li-kia-si-kia-po-no (Mṛgaśikhāvana) for Chinese pilgrims. The king endowed the temple with the revenue of 24 villages for its maintenance.[11] Only the brick foundation of this temple survived in Yijing's time.[12]

Numismatist

J. F. Fleet opposed this theory, pointing out that according to Yijing's writings, Che-li-ki-to flourished five hundred years before him (that is, in the second century), while Gupta ruled in the late 3rd century. Moreover, the Gupta inscriptions mention the king's name as "Gupta" (which would be transcribed as ki-to, 笈多), not "Shri-gupta" (Che-li-ki-to). Allan argued that Yijing's statement about the king's date should not be taken literally, and that the Chinese writers visiting India often used "Shri" as an honorific.[10]

Based on available evidence, Gupta's religious affiliation is unclear. Historian A. K. Narain theorizes that he was a Vaishnavite, who was tolerant of Buddhist activity in his kingdom.[13] This latter scenario would have been comparable with the later Gupta monarchs, who were predominantly Vaishnavite, but under whose regimes heterodox religious movements like Buddhism and Jainism were allowed to flourish.[14]

Territory

Some scholars, such as D. C. Ganguly and

Ganges river, and have identified its location in present-day Bengal region.[15] Majumdar read Mi-li-kia-si-kia-po-no as a transcription of Mriga-sthapana, the name of a stupa which was located in the historical Varendra region of Bengal.[15] According to Ganguly, this suggests that the Gupta dynasty originated in Bengal, while according to Majumdar, this only proves that Bengal was a part of Gupta's kingdom.[16]

Other scholars, such as

IAST: Mṛgaśikhāvana), and identify it with Mrigadaya (Deer Park) in Sarnath, in present-day eastern Uttar Pradesh.[12] Ashvini Agrawal argues that Mi-li-kia-si-kia-po-no is not an exact transcription of Mriga-sthapana: Mriga-shikha-vana is closer, and a different interpretation of Yijing's writings suggests that Mi-li-kia-si-kia-po-no was located in Sarnath.[17] Sinha theorizes that Hwui-lun erroneously mentioned its location as east of Nalanda.[18] These historians propose that the Gupta dynasty originated in eastern Uttar Pradesh.[17][18]

References

Citations

  1. ^ Full inscription, Fleet, John Faithfull (1888). Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Vol. 3. pp. 1-17.
  2. ^ a b Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 86.
  3. ^ a b R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 6.
  4. Bhandarkar, D. R.; Chhabra, B. C. (1981). Gai, G. S. (ed.). Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum: Inscriptions of the early Gupta Kings
    . Archaeological Survey of India.
  5. ISBN 8170172225
    .
  6. ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, pp. 84–85.
  7. ^ Tej Ram Sharma 1989, p. 42.
  8. ^ Tej Ram Sharma 1989, pp. 49–55.
  9. ^ a b c R. C. Majumdar 1981, pp. 6–7.
  10. ^ a b c Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 85.
  11. ^ Dilip Kumar Ganguly 1987, p. 7.
  12. ^ a b Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 80.
  13. ^ A. K. Narain 1983, pp. 17–52.
  14. ^ A. K. Narain 1983, p. 44.
  15. ^ a b Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 79.
  16. ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, pp. 79–80.
  17. ^ a b Ashvini Agrawal 1989, pp. 81–82.
  18. ^ a b Tej Ram Sharma 1989, p. 38.

General sources

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gupta_(king)&oldid=1218006908"