Chandragupta I
Chandragupta I | |
---|---|
Gupta empire | |
Dynasty | Gupta |
Father | Ghatotkacha |
Religion | Hinduism |
Gupta Empire 320 CE–550 CE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chandragupta I (
Period of reign
Chandragupta was a son of the Gupta king
Chandragupta certainly reigned in the first quarter of the 4th century CE, but the exact period of his reign is uncertain.
Chandragupta I probably had a long reign, as the Allahabad Pillar inscription suggests that he appointed his son as his successor, presumably after reaching an old age. However, the exact period of his reign is debated.[12]
Various estimates for Chandragupta's reign include:
- A. S. Altekar: 305–325 CE[10]
- S. R. Goyal: 319–350 CE[10]
- Tej Ram Sharma: 319–353 CE[13]
- Upinder Singh: 319-335/336 CE CE[14]
Marriage to Kumaradevi
Chandragupta married the Lichchhavi princess Kumaradevi.
An 8th-century inscription of the Lichchhavi dynasty of Nepal claims that their legendary ancestor Supushpa was born in the royal family of Pushpapura, that is,
The Lichchhavi kingdom of Kumaradevi is unlikely to have been located in present-day Nepal because Samudragupta's Allahabad Pillar inscription mentions Nepala (that is, Nepal) as a distinct, subordinate kingdom. Given the lack of any other evidence, historian R. C. Majumdar assumed that during Chandragupta's time, the Lichchhavis ruled at Vaishali, which is the only other base of the clan known from the historical records.[15]
Impact of marriage
The gold coins attributed to Chandragupta bear portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi, and the legend Lichchhavayah ("the Lichchhavis").[5][16] Their son Samudragupta is described as Lichchhavi-dauhitra ("Lichchhavi daughter's son") in the Gupta inscriptions.[16] Except Kumaradevi, these inscriptions do not mention the paternal family of the dynasty's queens, which suggests that the Gupta family considered Kumaradevi's marriage to Chandragupta an important event.[6]
Numismatist
It is more likely that the marriage helped Chandragupta extend his political power and dominions, enabling him to adopt the title Maharajadhiraja.[6] The appearance of the Lichchhavis' name on the coins is probably symbolic of their contribution to the expansion of the Gupta power.[18] After the marriage, Chandragupta probably became the ruler of the Lichchhavi territories. Alternatively, it is possible that the Gupta and the Lichchhavi states formed a union, with Chandragupta and Kumaradevi being regarded as the sovereign rulers of their respective states, until the reign of their son Samudragupta, who became the sole ruler of the united kingdom.[16]
Extent of kingdom
Little is known about Chandragupta other than his ancestry, his marriage, and his expansion of the Gupta power, as evident from his title Maharajadhiraja.[7] The territorial extent of Chandragupta's kingdom is not known, but it must have been substantially larger than that of the earlier Gupta kings, as Chandragupta bore the title Maharajadhiraja.[19] Modern historians have attempted to determine the extent of his kingdom based on the information from the Puranas and the Allahabad Pillar inscription issued by his son Samudragupta.[21]
The Allahabad Pillar inscription names several kings subjugated by Samudragupta. Based on the identity of these kings, several modern historians have tried to determine the extent of the territory that he must have inherited from Chandragupta. For example, since the king of the northern part of the Bengal region is not mentioned among the kings subjugated by Samudragupta, these historians theorize that northern Bengal was a part of Chandragupta's kingdom. However, such conclusions cannot be made with certainty, as the identity of several of the kings subjugated by Samudragupta is a matter of debate.[19] Nevertheless, the information from the inscription can be used to determine the territories that were not a part of Chandragupta's kingdom:[22]
- In the west, Chandragupta's kingdom probably did not extend much beyond Prayaga (modern Prayagraja), as Samudragupta defeated the kings of present-day western Uttar Pradesh.[22]
- In the south, Chandragupta's kingdom did not include the Mahakoshala area of Central India, as Samudragupta defeated the kings of the forest region, which is identified with this area.[22]
- In the east, Chandragupta's kingdom did not include southern Bengal, because the Allahabad Pillar inscription mentions Samatata in that region as a frontier kingdom.[22] Moreover, the Delhi Iron Pillar inscription suggests that Vanga kingdom in that region was conquered by the later king Chandragupta II.[23]
- In the north, the Allahabad Pillar inscription mentions Nepala (in present-day Nepal) as a frontier kingdom.[24]
A passage in the
According to historian
Coinage
Gold coins bearing portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi have been discovered at Mathura, Ayodhya, Lucknow, Sitapur, Tanda, Ghazipur, and Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh; Bayana in Rajasthan; and Hajipur in Bihar. The obverse of these coins depicts portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi, with their names in the Gupta script. The reverse shows a goddess seated on a lion, with the legend "Li-ccha-va-yah" (𑁊, "the Lichchhavis").[16][5]
Various scholars, including numismatist John Allan, have considered that the gold coins bearing the portraits of Chandragupta and Kumaradevi were issued by Samudragupta to commemorate his parents,[1][28] while others have attributed the issue of these coins to Chandragupta himself,[16][29] or even suggested that these coins were issued by the Lichchhavis.[30]
The identity of the female figure appearing on the reverse of these coins is uncertain.
Successor
The Allahabad Pillar inscription and the Eran stone inscription of Samudragupta state that his father Chandragupta selected him as the next king. The Allahabad Pillar inscription states that Chandragupta appointed him to "protect the earth", which suggests that Chandragupta renounced the throne in his old age, and appointed his son as the next king.[36]
The discovery of the coins issued by a Gupta ruler named Kacha have led to some debate about Chandragupta's successor. According to one theory, Kacha was another name for Samudragupta. Another theory is that Kacha was the elder brother of Samudragupta, and succeeded their father Chandragupta.[37]
The Kaliyuga-raja-vrttanta section of the Bhavishyottara Purana mentions that Kacha was a son of Chandragupta I from a
References
- ^ ISBN 9788120804401.
- ISBN 9781438109961.
- ISBN 9788120603455.
- ^ Full inscription, Fleet, John Faithfull (1888). Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Vol. 3. pp. 1-17.
- ^ a b c d Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 90.
- ^ a b c d R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 10.
- ^ a b R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 16.
- ^ a b R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 15.
- ^ Tej Ram Sharma 1989, pp. 50–51.
- ^ a b c Tej Ram Sharma 1989, p. 50.
- ^ R. C. Majumdar 1981, pp. 15–16.
- ^ Tej Ram Sharma 1989, pp. 50–52.
- ^ Tej Ram Sharma 1989, p. 55.
- ^ Upinder Singh 2017, p. xvi.
- ^ a b c R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 12.
- ^ a b c d e f R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 11.
- ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 91.
- ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 92.
- ^ a b c d e f R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 13.
- ^ a b Dilip Kumar Ganguly 1987, p. 13.
- ^ a b Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 95.
- ^ a b c d e Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 96.
- ^ a b Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 97.
- ^ Upinder Singh 2017, p. 343.
- ^ R. C. Majumdar 1981, pp. 13–14.
- ^ R. C. Majumdar 1981, p. 14.
- ^ Allen, John (1914). Catalogue of the coins of the Gupta dynasties. p. 8.
- ISBN 9781438109961.
- ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, pp. 91–92.
- ^ a b Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 94.
- ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, pp. 94–95.
- ^ Dilip Kumar Ganguly 1987, p. 48.
- ^ a b Dilip Kumar Ganguly 1987, pp. 48–49.
- ^ a b Dilip Kumar Ganguly 1987, p. 49.
- ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 93.
- ^ Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 103.
- ^ Tej Ram Sharma 1989, p. 71.
- ^ Dilip Kumar Ganguly 1987, pp. 62–63.
- ^ Dilip Kumar Ganguly 1987, p. 65.
- ^ R. C. Majumdar 1981, pp. 14–15.
Bibliography
- Ashvini Agrawal (1989). Rise and Fall of the Imperial Guptas. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0592-7.
- Dilip Kumar Ganguly (1987). The Imperial Guptas and Their Times. Abhinav. ISBN 978-81-7017-222-2.
- OCLC 34008529.
- Upinder Singh (2017). Political Violence in Ancient India. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-98128-7.
- Tej Ram Sharma (1989). A Political History of the Imperial Guptas: From Gupta to Skandagupta. Concept. ISBN 978-81-7022-251-4.
- Tej Ram Sharma (1978). Personal and Geographical Names in the Gupta Inscriptions. Concept. OCLC 5413655.