Radical retropubic prostatectomy

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Male perineum
Muscles of the male perineum
Prostate
Prostate location
Radical retropubic prostatectomy
ICD-9-CM60.4, 60.5

Radical retropubic prostatectomy is a

impotence
, but these outcomes are related to a combination of individual patient anatomy, surgical technique, and the experience and skill of the surgeon.

Description

Radical retropubic prostatectomy was developed in 1945 by Terence Millin at the All Saints Hospital in London. The procedure was brought to the United States by one of Millin's students, Samuel Kenneth Bacon, M.D., adjunct professor of surgery,

blood vessels, and nerves are identified.[citation needed
]

The prostate is removed from the urethra below and the bladder above, and the bladder and urethra are reconnected. The blood vessels leading to and from the prostate are divided and tied off. Recovery typically is rapid; individuals are usually able to walk and eat within 24 hours after surgery. A

surgical drain is often left in the pelvis for several days to allow drainage of blood
and other fluid. Additional components of the operation may include:

An intraoperative electrical stimulation

penile plethysmograph may be applied to assist the surgeon in identifying the difficult to see nerves.[citation needed
]

Indications

Radical retropubic prostatectomy is typically performed in men who have early stage prostate cancer. Early stage prostate cancer is confined to the prostate gland and has not yet spread beyond the prostate or to other parts of the body. Attempts are made prior to surgery, through

computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to identify cancer outside of the prostate. Radical retropubic prostatectomy may also be used if prostate cancer has failed to respond to radiation therapy, but the risk of urinary incontinence is substantial.[citation needed
]

Complications

The most common serious complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy are loss of urinary control and impotence. As many as 40% of men undergoing prostatectomy may be left with some degree of urinary incontinence, usually in the form of leakage with sneezing, etc. (stress incontinence) but this is highly surgeon-dependent. Continence and potency may improve depending on the amount of trauma and the patient's age at the time of the procedure, but progress is frequently slow. Doctors usually allow up to 1 year for recovery between offering medical or surgical treatment. Potency is greatly affected by the psychological attitude of the patient.[citation needed]

Even though the complications of prostate surgery can be bothersome, treatments are available, and patients should seek guidance from their physician instead of ignoring the problem.

References

  1. ^ "Patrick C. Walsh, M.D." urology.jhu.edu. Retrieved 18 June 2019.
  2. ^ Radical retropubic prostatectomy
  3. ^ "Erectile Dysfunction After Prostate Cancer". www.hopkinsmedicine.org. 19 November 2019. Retrieved 2020-04-01.
  4. ^ Kolotz, L, et al. A Randomized Phase 3 Study Of Intraoperative Cavernous Nerve Stimulation with Penile Tumescence Monitoring to Improve Nerve Sparing During Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Urology 2000;164(5):1573–1578.[1]
  5. PMID 26328137
    .
  6. ^ F.C. Burkhard (Chair), J.L.H.R. Bosch, F. Cruz, G.E. Lemack, A.K. Nambiar, N. Thiruchelvam, A. Tubaro Guidelines Associates: D. Ambühl, D.A. Bedretdinova, F. Farag, R. Lombardo, M.P. Schneider (2018). "EAU Guidelines on Urinary Incontinence in Adults" (PDF). European Association of Urology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-02-08. Retrieved 2020-03-28.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Klein, EA, Jhaveri, F, Licht, M. Contemporary technique of radical prostatectomy. In: Management of Prostate Cancer, Klein, EA (Ed), Humana Press, New Jersey, 2000
  • Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy a new extravesical technique report, The Lancet 1945, Volume 246, Issue 6379, Pages 693–696.
  • Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128(3):492–497.