SMS Drache (1861)

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Drache at anchor after her 1867 refit
History
Austro-Hungarian Empire
NameSMS Drache
NamesakeDragon
BuilderStabilimento Tecnico Triestino, Trieste
Laid downFebruary 1861
Launched9 September 1861
CompletedNovember 1862
Stricken13 June 1875
FateScrapped, 1883
General characteristics (as built)
Type
armored frigate
Displacement3,110 long tons (3,160 t)
Length70.1 m (230 ft)
Beam13.94 m (45 ft 9 in)
Draft6.8 m (22 ft 4 in)
Installed power2,060 ihp (1,540 kW)
Propulsion
Speed10.5 knots (19.4 km/h; 12.1 mph)
Complement346
Armament
  • 1862:
  • 10 × 48-pounder smoothbore guns
  • 18 × 24-pounder rifled, muzzle-loading guns
  • 1 × 8-pounder landing gun
  • 1 × 4-pounder landing gun
  • 1867:
  • 10 ×
    RML 7-inch (178 mm)
    guns
  • 2 × RML 2-inch (51 mm) guns
ArmorWaterline belt: 115 mm (4.5 in)

SMS Drache was the first of two

Navy List that year and eventually broken up
in 1883.

Design and description

The Drache class was designed in response to the

deep load. The ships had a horizontal steam engine that drove their single propeller using steam provided by four boilers that exhausted through one funnel. The engine produced a total of 2,060 indicated horsepower (1,540 kW) which gave the ships a speed of 10.5 knots (19.4 km/h; 12.1 mph). For long-distance travel, the Draches were fitted with three masts and barque rigged.[1] The ships had a complement of 346 officers and crewmen.[2]

The frigates were armed with ten 48-pounder smoothbore guns and eighteen 24-pounder rifled, muzzle-loading (RML) guns in the traditional broadside arrangement of older ships of the line. In addition, they carried a pair of landing guns, one of which was an 8-pounder and the second was a 4-pounder. They were equipped with ram bows. The Drache-class ironclads had a waterline belt of wrought iron that was 115 millimeters (4.5 in) thick.[2]

Service history

Drache was

Fasana. Tegetthoff brought the Austrian fleet to Ancona on 27 June, in an attempt to draw out the Italians, but the Italian commander, Admiral Carlo Pellion di Persano, refused to engage Tegetthoff.[6]

Battle of Lissa

Drache c. 1866

On 16 July, Persano took the Italian fleet out of Ancona and steamed to the island of Lissa, where they arrived on the 18th. With the main fleet of twelve ironclads, they brought troop transports carrying 3,000 soldiers.[5] Persano then spent the next two days bombarding the Austrian defenses of the island and unsuccessfully attempting to force a landing. Tegetthoff received a series of telegrams between the 17 and 19 July notifying him of the Italian attack, which he initially believed to be a feint to draw the Austrian fleet away from its main bases at Pola and Venice. By the morning of the 19th, however, he was convinced that Lissa was in fact the Italian objective, and so he requested permission to attack. As Tegetthoff's fleet arrived off Lissa on the morning of 20 July, Persano's fleet was arrayed for another landing attempt. The latter's ships were divided into three groups, with only the first two able to concentrate in time to meet the Austrians. Tegetthoff had arranged his ironclad ships into a wedge-shaped formation, with Drache on his right flank; the wooden warships of the second and third divisions followed behind in the same formation.[7]

While he was forming up his ships, Persano transferred from his

coastal defense ship Palestro with concentrated broadsides, including hot shot, which started a serious fire aboard Palestro. The latter attempted to withdraw, and was able to use her superior speed to escape from Drache. Left without her original target, Drache turned to fire at Re d'Italia along with several other Austrian vessels. One of them disabled the Italian ship's rudder, leaving her vulnerable to ramming. Tegetthoff steered his flagship at Re d'Italia and scored a clean hit with his ram, badly holing her below the waterline. During this period, Drache was hit several times; one shell struck her commander, Captain Heinrich von Moll, in the head, killing him instantly. Lieutenant Karl Weyprecht took command of the ship for the remainder of the battle. A minor fire was also started, though the ship's crew quickly suppressed it. Another shell knocked down her mainmast.[8][9] Apart from this, the ship was not badly damaged in the engagement.[10]

After Re d'Italia sank, the Italian fleet began to disengage, with the badly burning Palestro trailing behind, soon to be destroyed by a magazine explosion. Persano broke off the engagement, and though his ships still outnumbered the Austrians, he refused to counter-attack with his badly demoralized forces. In addition, the fleet was low on coal and ammunition. The Italian fleet began to withdraw, followed by the Austrians; Tegetthoff, having gotten the better of the action, kept his distance so as not to risk his success. As night began to fall, the opposing fleets disengaged completely, heading for Ancona and Pola, respectively.[11]

Later career

After returning to Pola, Tegetthoff kept his fleet in the northern Adriatic, where it patrolled against a possible Italian attack. The Italian ships never came, and on 12 August, the two countries signed the

Dual Monarchy held veto power over the other, and Hungarian disinterest in naval expansion led to severely reduced budgets for the fleet.[2] In the immediate aftermath of the war, the bulk of the Austrian fleet was decommissioned and disarmed.[13]

The fleet embarked on a modest modernization program after the war, primarily focused on re-arming the ironclads with new rifled guns. The budget for 1867 provided funds to modernize Drache and Salamander first, as they were the oldest ironclads in the fleet.

naval register on 13 June. The Navy attempted to sell the ship to China, but the proposed sale came to nothing, and she was eventually sold for scrap in 1883 and broken up over the following year.[2][15]

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b Silverstone, p. 17.
  2. ^ a b c d Sieche & Bilzer, p. 267.
  3. ^ a b Silverstone, pp. 17, 26.
  4. ^ Greene & Massignani, p. 210.
  5. ^ a b Sondhaus, p. 1.
  6. ^ Wilson, pp. 216–218, 228.
  7. ^ Wilson, pp. 221–225, 229–231.
  8. ^ Wilson, pp. 232–235, 243.
  9. ^ Sokol, p. 45.
  10. ^ Wilson, p. 245.
  11. ^ Wilson, pp. 238–241, 250.
  12. ^ Sondhaus, pp. 1–3.
  13. ^ Sondhaus, p. 8.
  14. ^ Sondhaus, p. 10.
  15. ^ Sondhaus, pp. 39, 70.

References

  • Greene, Jack & Massignani, Alessandro (1998). Ironclads at War: The Origin and Development of the Armored Warship, 1854–1891. Pennsylvania: Da Capo Press. .
  • Sieche, Erwin & Bilzer, Ferdinand (1979). "Austria-Hungary". In Gardiner, Robert; Chesneau, Roger & Kolesnik, Eugene M. (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. London: Conway Maritime Press. pp. 266–283. .
  • Silverstone, Paul H. (1984). Directory of the World's Capital Ships. New York: Hippocrene Books. .
  • Sokol, Anthony (1968). The Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian Navy. Annapolis: United States Naval Institute. .
  • Sondhaus, Lawrence (1994). The Naval Policy of Austria-Hungary, 1867–1918. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press. .
  • .