Talk:Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted: Difference between revisions
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Transcluding GA review Tag: Reverted |
Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 2,616 edits promote Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted to good article (GANReviewTool) Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA|15:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)|topic=Video games|page=1|oldid=1201191550}} |
|||
{{GA nominee|14:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:The Night Watch|<span style="color:black;"><span style="font-size:110%">''The Night Watch''</span></span>]] [[User talk:The Night Watch|<span style="color:brown;"><span style="font-size:85%;">(talk)</span></span>]]|page=1|subtopic=Video games|status=onreview|note=|shortdesc=2019 video game}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA| |
||
{{WikiProject Video games |class= |
{{WikiProject Video games |class=GA|importance=Low|Indie=yes }} |
||
{{WikiProject Horror |importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Horror |importance=Low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 15:18, 5 February 2024
 | Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 5, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CNatorial.
Above undated message substituted from
Overarching Edits
The various edits I made to this article were in order to bring it into compliance with the video game style guide, as well as revise grammar and add proper citations throughout. The previous format of the Gameplay section, with an item-by-item list of game mode descriptions, seemed too detailed for an encyclopedia article.
CNatorial (talk) 10:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 19 December 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:03, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. It appears that WP:COMMONNAME for this title. There was a non-VR version released on December 19, but it would be premature to assume that common usage overall has changed. However, I will create a new redirect from the proposed title to this article, which does mention the non-VR version. Dekimasuよ! 08:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Question
Hi can I help you? 2A00:23C6:B308:6E01:F14D:1A2:AAA5:D (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
"Five Nights at Freddy's 7" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Five Nights at Freddy's 7 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § Five Nights at Freddy's 7 until a consensus is reached. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 15:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Begocc (talk · contribs) 11:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
New to good article reviewing, tell me if i did anything wrong and/or how to improve.
GA review
Last updated: 15:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC) by Begocc
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- 1b) it complies with the list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research
- 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- 2c) it contains no original research
- 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3) Broad in its coverage
- 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:
4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:
- 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
- 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall: 
Comments:
The tone could be slightly more encyclopedic but is overall a very good article, with a nice plot section and a good lead.
Good job!