User talk:JohnMizuki

Rodolfo Camacho Viera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ^{+ c} 14:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page De Daemonialitate et Incubis et Succubis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It does not seem to pass

WP:GNG

, with too few reliable sources to indicate standalone notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belzeba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Going Ape is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going Ape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 03:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnMizuki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, JohnMizuki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Domingo Prat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section

.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 13:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Bryce and Son, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jules Lachelier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:43, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uğurcan Yüce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnMizuki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hi JohnMizuki. Thank you for your work on Bernardino Scardeone. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article. I noticed that it includes translation of part of the equivalent article on it:Wiki. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this! quite the contrary. However, translations from other Wikis do need to be attributed (I've done that for this article). Take a look at Help:Translation § Licensing for further information. Best wishes.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

@Ingratis: There must be a misunderstanding, I didn't translate from the Italian article, as it is unsourced.

I'm sorry if I've misunderstood. The section "Early life" in the English article is extremely similar to the first two paragraphs of the section "Origini e formazioni" in the Italian one. May I take it that you translated from the Dizionario biografico? The Italian article does also acknowledge this as a source (in fact, its only source), although not in the form of an inline citation. Ingratis (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the Demonomania of the Sorcerers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ L 🌸 (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is this translated from the equivalent article on the Spanish Wikipedia? if so, would you please add the attribution as above, as I see you have recently been doing to your other translations.

For clarity, translation from other Wikipedias is fine as long as it is correctly attributed (but see below). Copying or translating from public domain sources is similarly fine if attributed. Copying, translating or close paraphrasing from copyright sources (such as the Treccani website, for example) is not OK -

Hi. I wrote both articles, the one in Spanish and the one in English. JohnMizuki (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK, fair enough! I'll add a note to the talk page to stop anyone else bothering you about attribution (not that that's very likely). Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 17:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnMizuki. Thank you for your work on Trinidad Huerta. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this interesting article. I note that you are also the author of the equivalent article on the Spanish Wikipedia. Best wishes,

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 18:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnMizuki,

Thank you for creating Carlos García (pianist).

Life part is not well references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Old-AgedKid}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Old-AgedKid: The article is very recent. I'm still working on it. JohnMizuki (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnMizuki,

I had to fix the formatting on this AFD and I'd like to encourage you to use

Thank you! I didn't know about that tool, very appreciated. JohnMizuki (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For all the biography articles of musicians you're working on! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:40, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My first Barnstar! Thanks! :) JohnMizuki (talk) 11:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure it won't be the last. :-) -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your contributions to tango musicians and thought you might be interested! Erick (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Just joined :) JohnMizuki (talk) 17:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, as a quick tip, please add |blp=no to the banner shell on the talk page of articles of people who aren't alive (BLP=biography of living person). I try to do that myself when I spot them, e.g. at Talk:Alberto Amor, as they get flagged at Category:Biography articles without blp parameter. Keep up the good work overall! -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I didn't know about that, thanks! JohnMizuki (talk) 09:01, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnMizuki, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks! :) JohnMizuki (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnMizuki, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:24, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! JohnMizuki (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome onboard. :-) -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of

Hello, I have added more credible sources and additional information on the notability of the building itself for Rock Ridge High School (Virginia, MN). That said, please review and check my sources for credibility. Wolverinebus (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]