Talk:1927 FA Cup final
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
1927 FA Cup Final, gifting victory to Cardiff City? | ||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 23, 2022. | ||
Current status: Featured article |
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.sportingchronicle.com/FACUP/1927.html
- In 1927 FA Cup Finalon 2011-05-25 02:56:36, 404 Not Found
- In 1927 FA Cup Finalon 2011-06-02 03:30:23, 404 Not Found
- In
--
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is Talk:1927 FA Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
@Miyagawa: Not much to complain about, good job:
- "and a further 15,000 fans listed " -listened?
- "The phrase "back to square one" was created during the broadcast; square one was the term used to describe an area nearest to one of the goal" -seriously? Is that accurate? You'd think it older than that.
- So did I! But, yes, apparently as this was the first game broadcast they published this grid system in the Radio Times that week (although I haven't been able to track down the magazine to confirm this as the website mentioning that isn't reliable enough for Wiki purposes) and would refer to a numbered grid location for where the ball was. Square one happened to be by one of the goals, so when the team played the ball back to the goalkeeper (as they would prior to the rules changes for back passes in the 90's), the phrase "back to square one" (i.e. the start of a play) was born. Miyagawa (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- "and a chance was had by Hardy which appears to shake Lewis " -appeared?
♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Great, thanks for reviewing. I have to admit when the contest started, this was my #1 article target as I felt there would be a lot out there about the game. Miyagawa (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: This might further benefit from somebody at the Football project giving it a good going over but it looks decent enough to me, excellent job! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Dubious
Re: "back to square one", although the bit about a grid being printed in the Radio Times is true, the Oxford English Dictionary says it is highly unlikely that this is the origin of the aforementioned phrase. They cite the earliest usage as 25 years after this match: "He has the problem of maintaining the interest of the reader who is always being sent back to square one in a sort of intellectual game of snakes and ladders". If you think about it, this is a far more likely origin than the football one.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Revdel
Please, revdel this edit and edit summary (and pretty much every related revert) because of persistent disruptive editing.
]Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on