Talk:1972 Nicaragua earthquake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Should mention how visible earthquake damage remained in the city for many years afterwards, and how dissatisfaction with the government response to the earthquake was kind of the opening wedge of what eventually led to the downfall of Somoza... AnonMoos (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Money money money

This site says damage was US$1 billion; this puts it over 40% of GNP. Is there a reliable number? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 03:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article in ASTIN Bulletin, Vol 9, No. 3, by the Central American Actuarial Association, mentions US$ 845 million in earthquake damages. Interestingly, the GDP of Nicaragua in 1972 was US$ 878 million at current market prices, according to World Bank estimates. See GDP at market prices. This would imply earthquake damage amounted to 96% (sic) of GDP. I guess some more searching is needed here - Arjuno (talk 22:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement ???

A copyvio tag was placed in the article by

USGS are in the public domain (See also: USGS). Is there any reason we should consider this specific USGS article an exception? - Arjuno (talk 01:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

I don't think there is, and am hereby clearing the investigation. The attribution template has been added to the References section. MLauba (talk) 10:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1972 Nicaragua earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]