Talk:1988–1994 British broadcasting voice restrictions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United Kingdom High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTelevision High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRadio High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconBBC High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Other : *Restructure the category
  • WikiProject iconJournalism High‑importance
    WikiProject icon
    WikiProject iconFreedom of speech High‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
    HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

    GA Review

    This review is
    Talk:1988–94 British broadcasting voice restrictions/GA1
    . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

    Reviewer: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) 10:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    As I've already read and commented on the article, and personally remember the ban, I'm happy to review.

    General

    • No problems with external links or disambigs. Brilliant.
    • Is there any reason you picked the Sinn Féin offices as the lead infobox picture? In my view, a picture of Gerry Adams, by far the most obvious indication that the ban was happening to the average person, would be better. The BBC seem to agree, as their source here shows a picture of him in the foreground. File:Gerry Adams reading into mic.jpg might be a good candidate, as it shows him publicly speaking.
      • Done.

    Background

    • Can you confirm that the entirety of the first paragraph is cited to the BBC source? I'm struggling to find where it states that the major British television networks were specifically required to stop or delay broadcasting - it does mention "high profile struggles over particular programmes" in relation to Real Lives but not much else.
      • Added ref from Moloney and slightly reworded sentence. Should cover it now.

    The ban

    • The article states that the ban extended to all republican and loyalist groups, plus Sinn Féin, but the BBC source states 11. Because we rely on
      verifiability, not truth
      , I'd prefer to go with exactly what the source says.
      • The ban actually covered ten organisations and Sinn Fein. This Guardian ref should cover it.
    • If the ban was discussed in the house of Commons on 2/11/88, there will be a log of it in Hansard - the link is here and might well be worth using as an additional source. IMHO Hansard is a brilliant source for mining direct quotes and opinions from MPs, and it goes back to the 19th century.
      • Done.

    More later. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    • Marmaduke Hussey, Chairman of the BBC, called the ban a "very dangerous precedent" - a direct quotation needs a citation.
      • Done.

    Implementation

    • Can you clarify exactly where in the Moloney source cites that the ban was retrospectively applied to archive material?
      • Added note with quote from text.
    • The BBC source commenting on the IRA's food spokesman's opinions on sausage rolls being banned as "This demonstrated the surreal nature of the restrictions." is probably worth weaving into the article (if it's not implicitly obvious!)
      • Added extra sentence with Welch's quote.

    Lifting of regulations

    • Link to the Hansard transcript of John Major reviewing the ban in November 1993 with Jill Knight here. Already sourced to the Irish Times, but this direct link makes verification easier.
      • Done.
    • "Conservative MPs wanted more rigid restrictions" - the source given explicitly states it was "Many Conservative backbenchers and Unionist MPs", and this might be worth clarifying.
      • Done.
    • Hansard link for Major upholding the ban in February 1994 here - also refers to Gerry Adams' visit to the US around this period which was dubbed in the UK but nowhere else
      • Done. Couldn't find a mention of upholding the ban, but added it as a source for Adams' US visit. Mention of maintaining the ban may be in the next day's Hansard as it appears to have been announced on 4 February, but I haven't found the corresponding page. Can you help?
    • I think the sentence starting "The UK ban was lifted" wants to go in a separate paragraph - it's a definitive point in the whole story and deserves to stand out.
      • Done.
    • "On the same day Major announced that ten minor roads" - the source given just says "roads" and mentions they were all specifically in County Fermanagh. I thought it might be something to do with the George Mitchell Peace Bridge (source), part of the major road from Cavan to Enniskillen, but that was destroyed in 1972 and not restored until 1999.
      • Done. I've seen another source that refers to them as "rural roads", though a rural road isn't necessarily a minor one, I guess.

    Images

    • No copyright problems.
    • File:John Simpson.jpg might be worth adding to the "Analysis section" with his quote about how the ban affected his work.
      • Done.

    Lead

    • Sometimes known as the "Broadcast ban" or "Northern Ireland Notice" - these two terms are not cited, and not mentioned again in the article's body with a cite.
      • Removed. Tony Hall refers to it as the "Northern Ireland Notice", but I haven't seen the name used elsewhere.

    GA Checklist

    here
    for what they are not)
    1. It is reasonably well written.
      a (prose): b (
      lists
      )
      :
    2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
      a (
      reliable sources): c (OR
      ):
    3. It is broad in its coverage.
      a (
      focused
      )
      :
    4. It follows the
      neutral point of view
      policy
      .
      Fair representation without bias:
    5. It is stable.
      No edit wars, etc.:
    6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
      a (images are tagged and non-free content have
      suitable captions
      )
      :
    7. Overall:
      Pass/Fail:

    I don't see any significant problems - fundamentally this article meets the GA criteria. I'll put it On Hold just so the last few issues can be resolved. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for the review. Everything addressed now apart from the Hansard thing. Let me know if you can get to it. I also recall the ban, though I have to confess I was unaware of the more surreal aspects of it until I started work on this article. Thanks again.
    talk) 17:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    I don't think the Hansard issue is relevant to passing GA - possibly for FA, but as it stands the information is cited inline to a reliable source (The Independent 5/2/94) and marked in the "References" section, which meets the GA criteria, so I'm happy to say this is a Pass. Well done. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Fantastic. Thanks again for reviewing this.
    talk) 10:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    Proposed new paragraph

    The effects of this subject have been revisited in recent times following the 2013 Woolwich attack. I'd like to add a paragraph on it, but thought I should post it here first for comment. My chief concern is getting the language right. I'll also mention this at

    Talk:Death of Lee Rigby
    . The paragraph is as follows:

    The broadcast ban came under the spotlight again in 2013, after the BBC aired an interview with

    fatal stabbing of an off-duty British soldier by two men who expressed extreme Islamist views.[1] After Choudhary refused to condemn the attack on an edition of Newsnight, Conservative Home Secretary Theresa May said she was considering giving the media regulator Ofcom the power to prevent future interviews with members of banned organisations.[2] However, the plans were criticised by senior politicians and commentators.[2] Recalling the broadcast ban Jack Straw, a Home Secretary under the previous Labour administration called it "one of the most intolerant and least successful" measures introduced by Thatcher's government, which acted as a "great recruiting sergeant" for the groups concerned.[2] The author and historian Timothy Garton Ash called the idea "impractical" and suggested it would be as ineffective as it had been in the 1980s.[1]

    Any thoughts on this would be much appreciated. Thanks

    talk) 13:37, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

    References

    1. ^ a b Gardon Ash, Timothy (30 May 2013). "After Woolwich, don't ban hate speech, counter it. Hate it, too". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 14 July 2013.
    2. ^ a b c Furness, Hannah; Swinford, Steven (27 May 2013). "Banning extremists from TV would act as 'recruiting sergeant'". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 14 July 2013.