This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
I've been going through the history of riots, many seem to appear to be in the USA. There appears to be a common theme however in the titling of articles on Wikipedia. Race riots where the rioting group were white are listed and named as race riots, but where it's any other group it's simply listed as a 'riot' and the entire angle of the article is revisionist. I'm from a non-English speaking background in southeast Asia, and find this hypocrisy to be quite perplexing. Numerous editors (especially foreigners such as myself) point out in the history of this talk page that it should be termed a race riot, yet it appears to be outright ignored.
Can someone please enlighten me why there appears to be blatant NPOV slants on this issue? As someone with no dog in this race attempting to research the subject I find the overt bias and delegitimization of the victims of these horrific crimes to be very confusing. Vergilianae (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good point, the reason is that the mainstream view in the public debate on these issues is not in fact objective. Therefore NPOV does not really mean 'no point of view', it just means not diverting from the mainstream view (in the media, because those are the sources). The victims of the current riot - even if they are black storeowners - will also matter less. We can only wait for the day not far from now, that these pages will be retiteled, since now rioting is just 'protesting'. Dg21dg21 (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
NPOV actually means "neutral point of view" rather than "no point of view".
Wikipedia articles do tend to defer to "mainstream" US media, even when the MSM are clearly biased. I don't think this is policy, though; it just reflects preponderance of unconscious bias among Wikipedia editors. Longitude2 (talk) 13:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it assumed that Koreatown was only attacked because white areas were better protected? When Baltimore rioted over Freddie Gray the crowds there targeted Korean owned businesses and there isn't a white person of note in the power structure of that city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.162.0.126 (talk) 17:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Cover me"
I do not want to edit the article but the source for the "Cover Me" story is not accurate. Harvard Kennedy School of Government Case Program wrote three different case studies which are 1586.0 - (A), 1587.0 - (B), and 1588 - (C). I went back and checked the original entry which is here Revision as of 02:26, 26 March 2018 and it uses the source "The Flawed Emergency Response to the 1992 Los Angeles Riots (C)" but the current wiki edition uses (A). The source comes from Major General James Delk who was the commander of California National in the LA Riots in his book Fires and Furies on Page 221. The Army War College uses this story in their publication for their quarterly "Parameters" on page 2. Also the entry appears to be an exact copy and paste from Delk's book which I believe runs afoul of
The intro states "a jury acquitted four officers of the Los Angeles Police Department", but if you follow the link, it seems that the jury actually acquitted 3 of the officers and was unable to reach a decision (hung jury) on the other. This should be corrected.
The State could presumably have re-tried the officer who was not acquitted (reports state that he was the one who struck almost all of the blows on Mr King) but chose not to. There's no indication as to why. Longitude2 (talk) 11:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could someone clarify this sentence?
"With these misunderstandings between the two races, many believe that education is the only way to gis rid of these conflicts in the future."
I'm not sure.
Plus Black, as in the race, is inconsistently capitalized in the article. Could someone fix it? Thanks. I don't want to edit over someone who may understand better.--KimYunmi (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}