Talk:2006 O'Hare International Airport UFO sighting

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Illinois Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Paranormal This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Skepticism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I noticed that there was a copy edit tag added to this article and being the original author I cleaned up what I thought might be the problem and what the other editors had tagged. If there are any other specific grammar, style, cohesion, tone and/or spelling mistakes, please let me know and I'll correct them ASAP. Thanks.

I agree that evidence of the sighting is bogus, but

I removed the "fake" UFO photo added by another user because I didn't think it was relevant to the article. "Real" photo yes. Fake photo, no. North 66 17:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a neutrality tag to the last section because it only cites one source -- a source that apparently believes in UFO's. It gives a one-sided view of the media's attitude towards UFO's.

I added other sources and removed the neutrality tag. If I find sources that don't apparently believe in UFOs but yet criticizes the media for not covering them seriously (unlikely) or on the other hand, thinks national media coverage of UFOs by big media is spot on, I'll add those too. I assume if you don't agree with me on the difficulty in finding such sources, you'll add the neutrality tag again. North 66 15:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhqJZ47mf24
  • In 2006 O'Hare International Airport UFO sighting on 2011-05-26 02:11:04, 404 Not Found
  • In 2006 O'Hare International Airport UFO sighting on 2011-06-14 06:19:35, 404 Not Found

--

Throughout the article references are made to an object or UFO, but isn't the proper classification in this case that of an Unidentified Atmospheric Phenomena or UAP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.64.135.112 (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. The eyewitnesses described something clearly not made of anything "atmospheric". They did not see a cloud. It was unidentified, it flew, and it was an object. That is literally what UFO stands for. 12.31.187.178 (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder, is there a high resolution satellite images of airport area of that day, where we could posibly see that hole in the cloud? Laurijs (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Chicago O'Hare airport incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 13 § Chicago O'Hare airport incident until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 16:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]