Talk:2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconIceland High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
project's importance scale
.
WikiProject iconAviation Start‑class
WikiProject icon
B checklist
WikiProject iconEurope Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRivers Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWeather: Climate Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Hacked?

http://i.imgur.com/7ULQc0w.png

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 05:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section on Short- and long-term weather and environmental effects

The paragraph on the relation to the solar cycle (starting 'While it is suspected') is highly speculative. The claims made are not scientifically accepted. There is no evidence that Icelandic eruptions are related to the sun (the only paper discussing any effect is on a few Japanese eruptions and it does not reach the 3-sigma level required for a detection) and the sentence beginning 'Most consider' presents opinion rather than accepted fact. I would recommend deleting this paragraph.ABZebra (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agricultural improvements and positives

Shortly after the volcano had become dormant, the fresh layer of soil resting above the previous earth was extremely fertile and allowed Iceland's agricultural industry to thrive. However, it took approximately 6 months before farming could resume due to a significant lack of infrastructure due to the extensive damage the eruption caused. On Icelandic farmer who had to evacuate his farm near Eyjafjallajökull said 'With this soil, I could become a multi-millionaire, but with these remaining resources, I can scarcely dig a hole.' Despite this, Iceland has rebuilt its economy and infrastructure at a pace which UK PM Gordon Brown considered 'excruciatingly fast', putting Iceland's farming produce back on the market across Europe and North America. To this date (2022) Iceland agricultural industry has rocketed up in size and popularity by 29% since the natural disaster that occurred in 2010. 88.202.152.248 (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]