Talk:2021 Fukushima earthquake

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2021 Fukushima earthquake article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Japan: Geography & environment / History Low‑importance

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Geography and environment task force.

This article is supported by the History task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

project's importance scale

.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:2021 Fukushima earthquake is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

ITN nomination

Just a notice to editors that this article was nominated on

talk) 05:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

ShakeMap intensity

This ShakeMap image is outdated as the USGS had revised the focal depth and intensity. Could someone upload a new image? Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dora the Axe-plorer,

Done HurricaneEdgar 14:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The USGS has updated their shakemap intensity and depth, could someone replace that again? Thx.--Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 13:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is a seismic intensity table really necessary?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I find it a bit confusing to read and navigate a table of seismic intensities. I find it unnecessarily complicated. Anyone looking at a table is not going to immediately know where and how strong the earthquake was felt. I live in the

SF Bay Area, and if I were to include a bunch of Bay Area towns that felt, say, the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake

, the list would not only get long but would also be difficult for readers outside the Bay Area to understand.

I think a map does a sufficient job at showing where an earthquake was felt and where damage occurred. Aasim (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both have been included in several Japanese earthquake articles to maintain both local and global context. I personally prefer the charts to the map, but I think they complement each other quite well. It should be left as is. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 14:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it a second time, Japan is a pretty small island nation, so maybe it would be useful to know which prefectures experienced which intensity. So maybe Japan is a special case; other small countries it would make sense as well. But I would definitely not do it for an earthquake in California, as there are so many counties in the US and you do not learn the names of state's counties or parishes, just national provinces... Aasim (talk) 10:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not super familiar with that article, so that's a discussion to be had there (if at all). I don't know if Dora the Axe-plorer is going to comment here, but it seems we've already reached a consensus to leave the chart as it is. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 00:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

March earthquake of similar strength

Just happened. Same place, basically the same strength. Add it to the existing article? Start a new article? https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/ 130.87.88.117 (talk) 09:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone started an article: March 2021 Miyagi earthquake. 130.87.88.117 (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maps in infobox

There are now three maps in the infobox. While I'm not saying any one of them is less important than the others, I think the editors working on this page should take a look at the articles in Category:FA-Class WikiProject Earthquakes articles for inspiration, as this article has the potential to reach that level of quality at some point. All of those articles have a maximum of one map in the infobox and any intensity maps are placed within the relevant sections of the article-which for this article would be the Seismic intensity section. As discussed before, both the JMA and USGS scales should be used here, so its fine to include both maps, but within the article's body. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 01:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]