Talk:2022 Berlin Marathon

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 00:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tigist Assefa in 2013

• ... that in the
  Tigist Assefa (pictured) won by running the third-fastest marathon ever by a woman, in her second marathon ever, breaking her personal best by nearly 20 minutes? Source: https://archive.today/20220925160648/https://www.runnersworld.com/news/a41372784/berlin-marathon-2022-womens-winner-tigist-assefa/
  • Reviewed: KBRH
  • Comment: this article has been linked to before on itn, but is not disqualified by rule 1d since the link was not bolded, as seen here.
    also, sources seem to vary regarding whether to explicitly qualify the "third-fastest" claim (as the qualification is often understood), but since i know that such statements are subject to heightened scrutiny at dyk, i decided to qualify it in the hook.
    note that i mentioned the year in the caption to make it clear that this photo was not taken during the marathon.
    by the way, i recognize that a few of the sources have yet to be formatted to dyk standards, but i wanted to nominate this before the deadline passed first. i have never gotten citation bot to work, and generally rely on friendly wikignomes to eventually help me out. if you would like to review this, please place it on hold after reviewing. i can address all other issues in the meantime, and eventually ping you once the sources are formatted to dyk standards.

Created by dying (talk). Self-nominated at 08:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral : Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed : Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Dying: Article seems good. Just a tip, when you make an article you don't need to put citations in the intro unless the topic in the intro is controversial. Considering how any topics in the intro will get explained in the article later you don't need to put citations in the intro. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]