Talk:5 Beekman Street
5 Beekman Street has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 16, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from 5 Beekman Street appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the unused 5 Beekman Street (pictured) hosted photo and film shoots with $1 million in revenue after a viral blog post in 2010? Source: Curbed
- ALT1:... that 5 Beekman Street (pictured) was described as "architecturally nondescript" and its rooftop spires were likened to "donkey's ears"? Source: Landau p. 116
- ALT2:... that an 1893 fire at 5 Beekman Street (pictured), described as "fireproof", severely damaged the top four floors? Source: NYCL p. 6
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 23:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I prefer the ALT2. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 20:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Thanks for the review. I have done a QPQ now. epicgenius (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)