Talk:AIL Storm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former good articleAIL Storm was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 27, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
October 26, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 5, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 14, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Israeli four-door Jeep Wrangler-based AIL Storm was produced before Jeep's own model?
Current status: Delisted good article

Good article candidate 2007-07-17

I am placing this article on hold, due to the "quality" issues that are holding this article back from GA status. Here is a list of problems that need to be fixed before this article can pass.

  • Images need to better placed for aesthetical reasons. In fact there are too many for an article of this size. Consider including a link to the Wikimedia Commons.
  • Image captions are sloppy in some cases.
  • Numerous unsourced statements, and where the information is referenced, it does not follow the citation guidelines (author name, title, publisher, accessdate, etc)
  • There are way too many poorly structured one sentence paragraphs. You need to either merge these with other sentences or elaborate on them.
  • Why include red links in the "See also" section?
  • The infobox does not really comply with the WikiProject Automobiles standards, and the generational box should probably be used in the "Storm II", and "Storm III" sections. --OSX (talkcontributions) 08:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article has improved significantly, but a second review has led me to spot more issues.
  • All metric units need to have conversions to imperial units in parentheses.
  • The lead does not seam to adequately summarise the subject, try adding another paragraph or two.
  • Infobox still not resolved. "Chrysler 3.983 litre 6-cylinder in-line petrol with fuel injection developing 180 hp at 4,700 rpm, fitted with Vortox 2-stage air cleaner or VW 2.5 litre 4-cylinder turbocharged diesel developing 118 hp at 4,200 rpm" is not right. it should be: 4.0 L Chrysler 6-cylinder<br />2.5 L VW turbocharged diesel 4-cylinder. You should even find out the exact engine model and link it to that, and include the rest of the information in the prose. OSX (talkcontributions) 05:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry that I hadn't gotten around to replying earlier. I hope that I've corrected the language, referencing, and lead issues, and I've just corrected the infoboxes' formatting and measurement unit conversion. While Flymeoutofhere took care of them, I wanted the
WP:REDLINKs per that philosophy of expansion infrastructure - does the MoS disagree? I am also uneasy about leaving out the sole image - perhaps you can think of another image arrangement? As for the engines, the ones that exist on WP are wikilinked. Do let me know what you think. Cheers, TewfikTalk 03:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Good work, but I feel that the article is missing some valuable citations. These instances have been marked with {{fact}} tags so you no exactly what needs to be done. Besides that I think the article is up to standard, so if you renominate it, I will most likely pass it. Cheers OSX (talkcontributions) 06:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good article candidate 2007-10-26

I am not going to re-review this article because my only objections in my last review were the missing references. Additionally, the article has hardly changed much content-wise since my last review either (see archive). So as this article meets all the criteria, I hereby promote it to good article status. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic addition of "class=GA"

A

BOT Giggabot (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AIL Storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

AIL Storm

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listed in 2007. Six citation needed tags. Israeli-Weapons.com and jeepolog.com appear to be

WP:SELFPUB. Schierbecker (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.