Talk:Ahsoka (TV series)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Star Wars High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Star Wars To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles. Citing sources : Jedi, Sith Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction. Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..." Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs Other : * See the things to do page Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Disney Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force. California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force. This article is supported by Southern California task force.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened: August 20 to 26, 2023 August 27 to September 2, 2023 September 10 to 16, 2023 September 17 to 23, 2023 September 24 to 30, 2023 October 1 to 7, 2023

This draft should be ready to move to the mainspace. Star Wars just posted on Twitter that production begins today. [1] Hummerrocket (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it still a limited series? Because while it says so I think on another page (Star Wars spinoffs?) it doesn't say so here--CreecregofLife (talk) 18:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To editors

I agree with 2pou, Unkreative made unsupported changes to the formatting of the article, which has been developed based on community consensus and aligns with the other Mandoverse series' articles, added unsourced details and details from unreliable sources, and made changes that go against WP:TV conventions. If there are specific parts of their edits that they feel strongly about including then they should explain why here and get consensus for each change. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I really don't see the problem you seem to have.

I just added, and expanded, information which I think is interesting and relevant for this subject. My sources (

Wikipedia:RSPDEADLINE are reliable, both by Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources

and common sense. the interview is with the Dawson is also kinda reliable (though not perfectly) and is worth mentioning. The plot premises were stated by LucasFilm and Dave Filoni. concerning the cast and introduction I added a bit of the characters backstory in star wars up to this point for their context in the series. I added the point about the false IMDb date because it probably confused/mislead a bunch of people about the status of the series (atleast it did it for me)

So where exactly is the big problem with my edits that you have to constantly revert them? If there are problems with specific points feel free to optimize them (thats the point of Wikipedia) but please stop reverting complete constructive edits and so delete useful information from articles. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 21:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can breakdown what the issues were with your edits as seen here:

• Lead
  • No indication the title will be "Star Wars: Ahsoka". It has only been announced and referred to as such at this point as simply "Ahsoka".
  • Ignored the hidden note about the animated series in the first paragraph. This series is most directly related to the "Mandoverse" so that is the most relevant series to link while adding "other Star Wars media" to cover the rest. The additional series info is noted in the second paragraph, which follows a similar formatting to The Mandalorian and Book of Boba Fett.
  • MOS:SEASON
    for indicating "fall 2023".
• Premise
  • StarWarsNews.net is an unreliable source
  • The info from the Celebration footage isn't super relevant yet since it really isn't a formal "premise" summary
• Cast and characters
  • Unexplained header removal
  • Bordizzo info: why the removal of already sourced info and adjustment of refs? Also, her Ghost info is not yet relevant (not to mention unsourced).
  • Esfandi info: some of this may be helpful, but the previous was succinct enough based on what is currently known (not rumored).
  • Hera and Chopper should not be bulletted until an actor is reliably sourced to be portraying them (notably for Hera)
  • Stevenson info: why add an the exact same source that's there? Also we don't need to quote THR as you did. The relevant info is he's an admiral and villain, info succinctly already there.
• Casting
  • Mikkelsen was always a rumor. Wikipedia should not discuss rumors, and since we technically don't know that Thrawn is showing up, it is of no benefit to mention this. Once we indeed know the character is appearing, and who is portraying them here, it will be relevant to mention the previous portrayal by Mikkelsen if necessary.
• Marketing and Release
  • No idea why the change of heading when "Release" already exists, and the two are independent of each other
  • Additions here were unnecessary seeing as the section already covered the Celebration footage. We don't need to state it was never publicly released.
• Release
  • Again, no clue why more info was added when it's already covered that it's intended to be releasing in late 2023. Again
    WP:IMDB
    so all that addition should not have happened.

So out of all those, the only valid additions were about StageCraft, which I went back formatted/adjusted better, and a link to

Also adding, much of what you added and as you stated I just added, and expanded, information which I think is interesting and relevant for this subject is beneficial to a fan wikia, not Wikipedia. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All this information is

• often relevant for context in the broader franchise (and a bit also for the TV induStry)
• useful for the people who search for information about the series (what kinda is the whole purpose and use of Wikipedia)
• just worth documenting

I really dont mean to offend you but this is a bit pedantic. States of articles change, they get optimized and expanded, it is only normal and part of the concept of projects like wikipedia, and this a good thing. and as I said before you can also do that with parts of articles that arent perfect (for example the Starwars.net source) but there really isnt a need for just reverting edits just because points get expanded and sentences minor change and differ from yours. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 17:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've yet to state exactly how any of this is relevant beyond what is already in the article. If you made some minor adjustments throughout that is one thing. These were large-scale reformatting (against consensus and the

MOS:TV. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry but seem to just ignore what I already said. Again:

• the characters backstory and previous appearances are relevant because it gives a bit of context about the characters and their established relationships and the role they will (probably) have in the series.
• the premise (which is otherwise completely missing) is for one part made of the official premise (https://d23.com/magical-moments-from-studio-showcase-day-2-marvel-studios-lucasfilm-and-20th-century-studios/ which I just sourced with starwarsnews.net) and based on quotes from Dave Filoni and the teaser, which is relevant because it gives an inside into the plot and charaters of an otherwise pretty vaguely kept series.
• Hera was in the teaser so she will probably appear in the series
• Stevenson extra info is relevant because else it just sounds like he was cast as thrawn and they just don't want to say it yet
• the intruduction is, admittedly, maybe a bit long. the second half should maybe be omitted.
• I dont really see what else i really reformatted and what of my edit was "in a way with the tone of a fan site/wikia" (apart from the fact that this, atleast in this context, would not always automatically be a something bad).

UnkreativeFrog (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't ignored anything as I've seen what you've tried to add and responded as such to each added/changed piece in the article of your edit. And based on how and what you did, and as explained, it came across with minutia, trivial details and formatting that made the article appear as if it was a fan site.

WP:NOTFANWEBSITE. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Favre1fane is spot on with everything he's said. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 19:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has requested assistance at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a dispute about this page. The discussion is located at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Ahsoka (TV series) This template is only a talk page banner - the dispute must be listed at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard for editors to respond.

UnkreativeFrog (talk) 08:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jauerback @Brojam Stop reverting constructive edits. this is getting disruptive. This article is missing a premise so I added one supported by reliable sources and added a sentence that was literally already in that article. Nothing about this is a controversial or bold change in any way. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you aren't logged into wikipedia and you go to the article you cannot click or highlight any text or links. It thinks the whole page is a link but it doesn't link to anywhere. Can someone else test this out? Page works normally when logged in.Achopstix (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just tested it and I have the same issue on mobile. Other articles seem fine, so it's just something off with this article. -- ZooBlazer^talk 19:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK wanted to make sure it wasn't just me...interesting. I don't have much experience with Wikipedia i actually JUST registered to post this...and then it went away so I was SUPER confused! Thanks for confirming hopefully someone can fix it. I have no idea. Achopstix (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's been fixed. :) Achopstix (talk) 20:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An official press release from Disney has the order of the Ahsoka cast listed here: https://assets.gettyimages.com/bf-boulder-whitelabelbucket-getty-prod/r58vvshrv5xcqqbzgzqmjtnx/v/1093969948/original/4.11.23%20SW%20Celeb%20Tues%20Wrap%20Up%20Press%20Blast.pdf.

Hoping we can use to rearrange the main cast for Ahsoka in this specific order. MarvelDisney20 (talk) 23:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There’s talk going around the actor is going to portray the character in live-action in this show. Is this article from CBR here enough to add him on the page here? 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 13:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info stems from an unreliable source, and thus it is

WP:FRUIT if any normally reliable sources such as CBR report on it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Well sorry okay I just got excited. 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 13:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Is this true? Likely, but Wikipedia works on sourcing info from reliable sources.

WP:NORUSH. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I know it has to be true even though the source is not considered reliable. People suspected for a time Namor would be in Black Panther and it turned out to be true even though there was no reliable source at the time. 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 17:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. But it is just coincidental. Besides, Wikipedia depends on reliable sources. Unreliable sources are not typically counted. JEDIMASTER2008 (talk) 02:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what saw the new episode of Ahsoka and Rex was in it voiced by Morrison. 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 02:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]