Talk:Am Buachaille

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance Talk:Am Buachaille is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scottish Islands Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oh my - I can find everything from 240 ft (73 m) down to 50 m. The 65m I've used in the text seems fairly middling and comes from a non-climbing but vaguely official sort of source. Anyone want to take a punt on a better height for this one? Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a hunt but I can see nothing better. Even W. H. Murray, who mentions it, does not provide a height. Ben MacDui 16:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking - guess this will have to do for now then. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]