Talk:Arctic Refuge drilling controversy

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alaska High‑importance Energy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Environment Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Protected areas Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kphelps1991.

Above undated message substituted from

Drill baby drill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.51.209.11 (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Their Reindeer. they Kinda look like a cross between a deer and a moose. Joesolo13 (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the history section it mentions that muskrats were given the right to select land....what in the hell do muskrats have to do with anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.184.118 (talk) 01:12, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• During a floor session of the
  Anna Fairclough
  ?) read an item that a vote was held today in Congress allowing limited drilling. I haven't looked this up in the news. Is it relevant to the article?

• How is
  Prudhoe Bay. If the location of this photo is actually in NPR-A, that just exacerbates the differences in perceptions between NPR-A and ANWR versus the reality.RadioKAOS (talk) 03:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Similar to straw+suction+stomach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.120.65.78 (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050901104604/http://www.columbia.edu:80/~sp2023/scienceandsociety/web-pages/Native%20Communities.html to http://www.columbia.edu/~sp2023/scienceandsociety/web-pages/Native%20Communities.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified 4 external links on Arctic Refuge drilling controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/columnist/waller/article/0%2C9565%2C170983%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100605080806/http://aitc.org/node/22 to http://aitc.org/node/22
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130322130754/http://indianz.com/News/2005/007098.asp to http://www.indianz.com/News/2005/007098.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101120224655/http://aitc.org/ to http://www.aitc.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The readability of the article as a whole would be improved by standardization of units. My suggestion is:

• Land area: square miles (km²) acres (ha) ... To address the argument for acres (ha), see below)
• Oil volume: bbl (m³). Standardize on billions, even if a few citations of millions will look small)
• Flow: million barrels per day (10⁶ m³/d)

As far as citations are concerned, I trust editors to do the math properly.
Use of standard measures will eliminate NPOV problems with hyperbole. Rhadow (talk) 16:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The units stuff is still kind of hard on the reader. Stuff like

the opening of ANWR reaches 780,000 barrels per day (124,000 m3/d) in 2027 and then declines to 710,000 barrels per day (113,000 m3/d) in 2030. In the low and high ANWR oil resource cases, additional oil production resulting from the opening of ANWR peaks in 2028 at 510,000 and 1.45 million barrels per day (231,000 m3/d), respectively.

is starts to look like wallpaper. We probably want a lot of these figures expressed in much rounder numbers in the prose, while accompanying the text with tables giving the precise values. Some units are hopeless, like Barrel (unit)#Oil barrels. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arctic Refuge drilling controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828211846/http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/anilca/toc.html to http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/anilca/toc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arctic Refuge drilling controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719041522/http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/2001/Mar/hour2_030201.html to http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/2001/Mar/hour2_030201.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051215071611/http://arctic.fws.gov/ecoregions.htm to http://arctic.fws.gov/ecoregions.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.wwf.ca/NewsAndFacts/NewsRoom/default.asp?section=archive&page=display&ID=1399
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051224140556/http://www.episcopalchurch.org/3654_67509_ENG_HTM.htm to http://www.episcopalchurch.org/3654_67509_ENG_HTM.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301113819/http://www.kinyradio.com/juneaunews/archives/week_of_05-22-06/juneau_news_05-24-06.html to http://www.kinyradio.com/juneaunews/archives/week_of_05-22-06/juneau_news_05-24-06.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is listed as a B-class article and included in the criteria (#1) is: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The lead has a 2020 "citation needed" tag that needs sourcing. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]