Talk:Astra (American spaceflight company)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Rocketry Bottom‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles Bottom This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale. Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2020

This Astra Space has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2001:18C0:61C:700:2C7E:26E7:2B55:C824 (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please change September 2016 to October 2016 ^[1] 2001:18C0:61C:700:2C7E:26E7:2B55:C824 (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• {{not done}} because the citation you provided is unavailable. Thank you. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 04:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The website works for me.  Done --mfb (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HELP ADMINISTRATOR, HELP ADMINISTRATOR, HELP ADMINISTRATOR, Soumyabrata prevents me from telling the truth about this article. MFB you saw my reference which was rejected by Soumyabrata. Can you notify an administrator. HELP, HELP, HELP,|answered=no|ans=no 2001:18C0:61C:700:849C:3108:509A:1CC (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soumyabrata, thinks he's God and don't want us to tell the truth about this article. Thank you mfb. 2001:18C0:61C:700:849C:3108:509A:1CC (talk) 09:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soumyabrata says my quote is not available. Which is entirely false. Anyone can access it. Besides, mfb had access to it. 2001:18C0:61C:700:849C:3108:509A:1CC (talk) 09:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down. Sometimes websites don't load for whatever reason, or they are down temporarily. That can happen. Don't assume malice when bad luck is a perfectly plausible explanation. Besides: It's not a critical issue if it was September or October. --mfb (talk) 09:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Astra themselves says October [1]. OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 15:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Soumya-8974: I interpret the article as just another day of delay. The title is confusing but the article makes it clear that they are still part of the challenge. --mfb (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't been following this a lot but this article says they may not be part of the challenge (DARPA?) anymore. OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 15:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SUCCESS, not FAILURES: The launch will be the third for Astra, coming after two launches in July and November 2018. Both launched from the PSCA in Alaska. These were originally believed to be failures. However, Astra stated that the first was successful, and the second was only "shorter than planned". Neither were designed to reach orbit, as they didn’t have functioning second stages.^[1] Cordialement. 2001:18C0:61C:700:3DC6:63EE:9943:BFBE (talk) 06:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so they still launch, just missed the launch challenge parameters. I updated the article. (@IP: This is about the third launch only) --mfb (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ mfb: Why updated only the third launch? 2001:18C0:61C:700:3DC6:63EE:9943:BFBE (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion here is only about the third launch. Start a separate discussion if there is something else that needs to be discussed. --mfb (talk) 02:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ mfb: Why updated only the third launch? 2001:18C0:61C:700:3DC6:63EE:9943:BFBE (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

This discussion here is only about the third launch. Start a separate discussion if there is something else that needs to be discussed. --mfb (talk) 02:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

SUCCESS, not FAILURES: the launch will be the third for Astra, coming after two launches in July and November 2018. Both launched from the PSCA in Alaska. These were originally believed to be failures. However, Astra stated that the first was successful, and the second was only "shorter than planned". Neither were designed to reach orbit, as they didn’t have functioning second stages.^[1] -- 2001:18C0:61C:700:4CA4:B512:742:DD58 (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Astra, Inc. has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Addition launch date — CRS-20 (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 01:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket 3.0: https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/ — CRS-20 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 02:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per https://astra.com/?start_date=2020-10-01T00:00:00.000Z& OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 03:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And now there are reports of an anomaly...https://kmxt.org/2020/03/anomaly-at-pacific-spaceport-complex-launch-rehearsal-no-injuries-as-a-result/ OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 04:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Rocket 3.1 Orbital Launch Attempt Liftoff! (50624215858).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the "reviewer" of the article. Here's the list of the problems that I saw:

• Some of the sources have their formatting broken. The sources are reliable for now. (ex. September 2020, Mike Wall 12)
• Lone sentences should be merged to a paragraph, with linking devices (because, as, but, etc.)
• There are some inappropriate use of dashes and capital letters, see Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style for more details
• A few in-line tags should be resolved , example being ^{[citation needed]}

Other than that, the article should be a B-Class, change the grade when you feel that the article deserved that. Hopefully, you can push this article to a Good Article, in that case, I see you there! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Rocket 3.1 Orbital Launch Attempt Liftoff! (50624215858).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as the Rocket series (i.e. Rocket 1 through 3.3) have some pretty substantial history now, and with space launch increasingly in the rear-view mirror for the company, I believe it would make sense to split them off into a separate page, where they might get a nicer treatment (i.e. infobox at the top of the page). I will be starting a draft. Sub31k (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you share the Draft? (EDIT: I found the article) Redacted II (talk) 17:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]