Talk:Beitegen
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725161517/http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3275609,00.html to http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3275609,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Demographic history: weird and unexplained
Taken at face value, the info doesn't make sense:
- 1596: all Muslims.
- 1875, Guérin: ca. 200, all Druze; recent large dislocation.
- 1881, SWP: 300 Muslims and 100 Druze.
- 1887 (ca.), Schumacher: about 1,215; all Druze.
- 1922, Mandate: 895 of 902 were Druze.
What's happening here? Constant large or total exchange of population? (See also very large, but not complete flight from Turkish army conscription before 1875). Some surveys less accurate than others? Also massive fluctuation in numbers, up and down. Very interesting when put into perspective, not at all addressed, just a pile of various data easily skipped by users. Arminden (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
"Beitegen" instead of Beit Jann
Why is the article named "Beitegen" instead of the Arabic (and official Israeli/Hebrew name) Beit Jann? Did someone think that the Crusaders are still around? Absolutely no-one (except professors of Crusader history) has heard of "Beitegen"! Monosig (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)