Talk:Benjamin Zephaniah

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Benjamin Zephaniah article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days

A news item involving Benjamin Zephaniah was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 December 2023.

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

African diaspora Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Anarchism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles   Anarchism WikiProject open tasks watch · edit · history · talk · purge Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Member list · Resources · How can I help? Today's featured articles 01 May 2024 – La Salute è in voi (talk · edit · hist) will be Today's Featured Article; see blurb Did you know 17 Apr 2024 – Joseph Déjacque (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion Articles for deletion 19 Apr 2024 – Jobbykrust (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Bearcat (t · c) was closed as delete by Explicit (t · c) on 26 Apr 2024; see discussion (9 participants) Good article nominees 15 Apr 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion Peer reviews 01 Mar 2024 – Gaetano Bresci (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion Requested moves 19 Mar 2024 – Anti-Authoritarian International by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion Articles for creation undated – Draft:Grass Roots Books (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC Cleanup (296) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (506) Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance). Birmingham Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Disability Benjamin Zephaniah is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles inactive .DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia articles

Poetry Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reggae Mid‑importance

This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I see it's already tagged, but just bringing it to the page. The source provided uses the same vague "caught up" phrasing. Did Zephaniah riot in the 1980s, was he a victim or just a witness? The quote "They happened around me" leans to witness, but "I was a big protestor, not just against racism but also apartheid." suggests activism, though the phrasing is not clear that he's referring to the same place and time.

Any other sources would be gratefully received. Unknown Temptation (talk) 13:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Animal rights and veganism

He was an honorary patron of The Vegan Society, Viva! (Vegetarians' International Voice for Animals), and EVOLVE! Campaigns, and was an animal rights advocate.

There is a broken link in reference 45. The current link to the Ambassador page is www.vegansociety.com/society/whos-involved/ambassadors.

He presented The Vegan Society's video on veganism "TRUTH OR DAIRY: who, what, where, when, how and why vegan" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il20eie8tgg in 1994 and wrote the song "Love the Life" for the society in celebration of World Vegan Month in 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8UfTJoFr9w Vhist1847 (talk) 20:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have again restored the original linking in the lede.

This was originally replaced, with the edit summary "ce/fmt, De-link common terms (by script) per MOS:OVERLINK", which includes no justification for removing them.

It has since been removed with edit summaries referring to

Unfortunately, while I have ben writing this comment, the same editor is now edit warring to remove them, with an edit summary including "take to talk", despite not having done so themself. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The original linking was removed (actually not removed since the unpiped links target the same pages) because it was completely unnecessary to pipe these links, per

WP:NOTBROKEN. It says specifically There is usually nothing wrong with linking to redirects to articles. Some editors are tempted, upon finding a link to a redirect page, to bypass the redirect and point the link directly at the target page. However, changing to a piped link is beneficial only in a few cases. Piping links solely to avoid redirects is generally a time-wasting exercise that can actually be detrimental. It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]]., which is exactly what you have done, here and here. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

There is nothing in NOTBROKEN which supports your original change. That change was unnecessary and is disputed, and was reverted as such, restoring the status quo. You have failed to discuss, much less give any valid reason for making, it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, the edits are supported by

alternative vote as alternative vote. They all link to the same pages and, according to the guideline, a piped link is completely unnecessary. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Then you will be able to cite the part of NOTBROKEN which says it is OK to make bulk changes like [[Veganism|vegan]] to [[vegan]]? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing "bulk" about it, the changes were consistent with the guideline, while your undoing of them wasn't.

vegan. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I've restored the status quo while discussion proceeds. I'm not clear how:

• the change to the town link complies with
  MOS:GEOLINK
• removing piped links for redirects doesn't violate
  WP:AINTBROKE
• NOTBROKEN supports a mass campaign of changing existing piped links to redirects.
  [OMT] 18:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

WP:ASTONISH. Why pipe vegan when vegan redirects to veganism, and so on? It's absurd. The idea that NOTBROKEN supports a mass campaign of changing existing piped links to redirects is not an argument I've ever made. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Correct, as AINTBROKE is a way of collaborating and not something that purports to be policy. However, it does very cleanly speak to this situation: "If there is no evidence of a real problem, and fixing the "problem" would not effectively improve Wikipedia, then don't waste time and energy (yours or anybody else's) trying to fix it." I'm also not sure these pipes are "obviously ridiculous" or we wouldn't be having this conversation. :-)

"Mass campaign" refers to the script-assisted edits; perhaps "mass" was too strong a word for ten of those edits in your last thousand. Still, the heart of the question remains unanswered.

[OMT] 20:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Except it can "fix" a problem since, per

WP:ASTONISH given that "alternative vote" is not a part of the target article's title. Furthermore, Non-piped links make better use of the "what links here" tool, making it easier to track how articles are linked and helping with large-scale changes to links. and If editors persistently use a redirect instead of an article title, it may be that the article needs to be moved rather than the redirect changed. As such the systematic "fixing of redirects" may eradicate useful information which can be used to help decide on the "best" article title. are also worthy considerations in favour of removing these pipes. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 14:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

25eanglin (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By all means make improvements. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I see you've now entirely removed "Described as "the people's laureate" by the Birmingham Mail" from the lead section? I think that's a perfectly fair claim, which provides a useful summary of his work, and is supported by the content in the article main body. So I think it is perfectly appropriate for inclusion in the lead section, sorry. Would be interested to see what others think. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. Those edits are a bit preference based.

I would also be interested to see what others think, though! 25eanglin (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. Let's wait and see. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The lead section's area regarding his awards is necessary, but it takes the entirety of it.

The lead section should - I as I think - summarize the person's life, rather than giving a promotional message about how cool they are. - 25eanglin (talk) 00:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]