Talk:Bird Kingdom

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bird Kingdom article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Birds Low‑importance

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images

). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

A fact from Bird Kingdom appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the aviary Bird Kingdom was once a museum that at one time held the mummy of Ramesses I?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

Wikipedia

Violates the NPOV policy

I want to inform contributing users that this article violates the neutral point of view policy. A special contribution (which can be viewed on the article's history) made on "22:05, 3 May 2006" by an unnamed contributor resulted in a subjective content. Sentences like "the animals displayed were abducted from their homes and are now forced to live in a perpetual state of confinement" are opinions that should be discussed on the talk page, not in the article. Such kind of strong subjective content should not be present in any article as per Wikipedia's Neutral Point Of View policy. Informing all contributors I am removing that content from this article. Also an advice: plz. can someone try adding more content to this page using Niagara Falls Aviary's official website and other sources. Some good information can be obtained by typing "niagara falls aviary" on Google search. Birdeditor 22:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As it is, the article is one big business brochure. Compare it in size and detail to, for example, the article about the entire city of Niagara Falls. I will trim it down to a more appropriate size. Eeksypeeksy 21:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded this, and it is DYK'ed and now a C-class. I think that's as far as it will go, however, there is just not much information out there about this. The Arbiter ^Talk 19:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bird Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]