Talk:Carrie Imler
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Seattle may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Carrie Imler appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
DYK nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a video of ballerina Carrie Imler dancing the 32 fouetté turns from Swan Lake went viral online? Source: "Carrie Imler, a former PNB principal and brilliant spinner (immortalized in a viral video), was able to vary her arm position during the turns to thrilling effect." ([1])
Created by Corachow (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC).
- The article is new enough and just long enough at 1,619 characters by the DYK check count, and it is well-cited throughout. The hook fact is interesting (at least to me), meets formatting guidelines and is adequately supported by its two references in the article. I checked a couple of non-hook facts, and they seemed to be adequately supported with no plagiarism/close paraphrasing concerns. With the QPQ review done, this looks good to go. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)