Talk:Central Commission for Navigation on the Rhine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconInternational relations Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Signatories

Belgium and The Low Countries weren't countries at the time of the Congress of Vienna; wasn't the United Kingdom of the Netherlands one of the original signatories instead? bwlenders 11:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Central Commission for Navigation on the Rhine/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Pretty short. Tom (talk) 17:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 11:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Central Commission for Navigation on the Rhine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]