Talk:Corruption in Iran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Proposed merge of Corruption in the Pahlavi dynasty

A new article,

Corruption in the Pahlavi dynasty, ought to be merged into this one because both articles are short (too short), and because both articles need to have more context, a sense of what has come before and what came after. For instance, many observers have described the Qajar dynasty as corrupt (see some sources listed at Talk:Corruption in the Pahlavi dynasty) so what must happen is that the corruption in Iran be described as a continuity, with each subsequent era inheriting and maintaining corruption, rather than inventing it. Binksternet (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Object I wrote the article in Farsi Wikipedia and I can tell you there is abundance of material solely written on this subject in academic sources. I therefore suggest in keeping it as an independent article and "let it grow" :).--Kazemita1 (talk) 23:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support it is within the scope of Corruption in Iran. It could simple be added as a large section within the page. Most corruption by country pages have historical details, not simply of modern governments. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corruption in Iran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 20:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

"Corruption"

Isn't calling it "corruption" a little biased? I thought the neutral point of view was a rule. GermanGamer77 21:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 million or 2 billion?

"After the revolution, the Central Bank of Iran published a list of 177 prominent individuals who had recently transferred over $2 billion out of the country, among them:

   Jafar Sharif-Emami, some $31 million
   Gholam Ali Oveisi, $15 million
   Namazi, $9 million,
   Nasser Moghadam, $2 million
   "Mayor of Tehran", $6 million
   "Minister of Health", $7 million
   "Director of the National Iranian Oil Company", over $60 million

"

None of these values are over $2 billion. So there must be a mistake somewhere but since I don't have access to the source I can't edit. Can someone do it? --Spafky (talk) 08:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]