Talk:Darrell C. Scott

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 10 April 2017 by reviewer Yashovardhan Dhanania (talk · contribs). Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@RexxS: @Bishonen: @Tapered: Greetings, I am working on the draft page for Darrell C. Scott and am seeking a collective opinion. Can we agree or disagree that the day Scott was named by President Donald Trump to be on his executive transition team, a position he still holds today, that appointment and position made him a notable person? (Aside from the numerous secondary independent sources he has received significant coverage on listed in the draft). I welcome your input. Cllgbksr (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, Cllgbksr. I'm not American, which makes me good for neutral admin actions that impact American politics, but bad for evaluating these kinds of niceties. I'll pass. (Noting in passing that RexxS isn't American either.) Bishonen | talk 15:55, 12 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

@SwisterTwister: Inviting SwisterTwister to weigh in on the conversation.Cllgbksr (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Inviting user DGG for their opinion on the notability question. Cllgbksr (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

@

WP:GNG @SwisterTwister: as the reviewer, what say you? Cllgbksr (talk) 18:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

But I do not think it have a reasonable chance of passing AfD. Articles on peripheral figures in the 2016election and transition have not usually been accepted there. The importance is both minor and temporary. DGG ( talk ) 19:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Thanks DGG for your input. Appreciate. Cllgbksr (talk) 22:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Located another article, significant secondary independent coverage per

WP:GNG [1], NY Post, WaPo, NY Times should establish subjects notability. Cllgbksr (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Added another secondary independent significant coverage article,

Daily Beast [2]Cllgbksr (talk) 01:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

@Cllgbksr: Greetings. This gentleman has substantial coverage from Cleveland.com—read Plain Dealer—and National Review. That being said, there's no coverage independent of Trump. I couldn't cast a 'delete.' That said, I think you're pushing a category: new African-American 'conservatives.' I don't endorse issue-oriented editing. But if you put it up, and I'm paying attention, I'll contest any sort of issue oriented editing, for or against. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becki Ronen. Tapered (talk) 03:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, no 'lefty' issue pushing, either. Tapered (talk) 03:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tapered: darn, my next article was going to be a puff piece on "Why people should vote Democrat"... j/k... thanks for your input. Cllgbksr (talk) 04:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/01/29/trump-black-voters-cash-giveaways-108072?__twitter_impression=true

Needs incorporation Wikipietime (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter 11/5/2020; “ The Dems have been planning this for a long time now. I wouldn’t be surprised if we discovered that THEY released Covid upon the world in order to regain power in America. I don’t put ANYTHING past them!”

Worthy of inclusion. Wikipietime (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crickets? Wikipietime (talk) 11:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]