Talk:Dharmapala (emperor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconIndia: History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in May 2012.
WikiProject iconBangladesh Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
The article falls into the work area of the History workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh
WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Untitled

This Article is Very Carelessly Written

No mention has been made of the fact that the Nesari plates of Rastrakuta Govinda(805 AD)refer to Dharmapala as the king of Vangala. Where was this city? D. C. Sircar writes that there is no evidence for such a city in Bengali literature. But there are many European and other references to Vangala which cannot just be wished away as A. Wink does ( Al-Hind, vol.1, p. 257). Ranajit Pal suggests that Banbhore near Karachi was Vangala[1]. This area was under the control of Dharmapala which accords with the data that he was a ruler of Vangala. Dharmapala certainly ruled modern Bengal but there is no proof of that he was a native of Bengal. History has to be written with greater care. Dharmapala was the suzerain of the Yavana lands. R. C. Majumdar saw this as a reference to Sindh and all the other writers have followed him. But Sindh was a part of Seistan province which also may have been included in the Yavana group. The Editor is totally unaware that there was Kanauj(Kohnouj) and Patali in Karman province. Most significantly, there was a Gour in Fars. This was not known to R. C. Majumdar and it is not safe to accept his ideas about the Yavanas. R. N. Frye writes about the strong Buddhist influence on eastern Iran.

Also it is ignored that Dharmapala was called Rahma by such a learned author as Masudi(Ruhmi of Sulaiman). This has a religious connotation as Rama was described as a Buddhist in Pali literature. The Sailendras whose state was called Ramaratta accepted Dhrmapala as an overlord. This article does not do justice to Dharmapala. mejda —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejda (talkcontribs) 07:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to Vangala is not referring to a specific city but to the region of Bengal. Just because there are mention of places with similar names does not mean that they are all referring to the same location. Dharmapala was the son and successor of Gopala (who was undoubtedly from Bengal). The realm ruled by Gopala was referred to as rajyam pitram (ie ancestral homeland) in numerous copperplate inscriptions (Bangarh, Monghyr etc) by his descendants who all ruled in some part of Bengal. It is unreasonable to assume that Dharmapala was not from Bengal while his father and his descendents were definately from Bengal. --Reahad (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

‘Rajyam Pitram’ may only mean ‘kingdom inherited from father’ but it has to be admitted that the interpretation ‘ancestral homeland’ need not be ruled out. The problem is that the strong Indian influence in the art of southeast Iran in this period may imply an Indian overlordship. Gubaru (Gopala?) is an ancient name in Persian history. Also how does one account for city-names such as Kohnouj, Konarak, Patali, Gour etc. in this area? It has to be remembered that Alexander the Great celebrated his famous 'victory over the Indians' at Kohnouj.

mejda —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejda (talkcontribs) 01:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]