Talk:Diane von Fürstenberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconWomen writers Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen in Business Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Renaming?

Since she does not use the official/traditional umlaut of the Fürstenberg surname, this article should be retitled accordingly.Kitchawan 17:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remarriage means that she is not merely "no longer entitled to use the title princess following her divorce and subsequent remarriage in 2001", but no longer entitled to use the surname Von Furstenberg either.203.184.41.226 (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dynasticity

As Kitchawan has now cited in the edt history, according to the
Guy Sainty has publicly criticized the Gotha and GHdA for inadvertently misleading genealogists and monarchists into believing that Heads of deposed dynasties automatically have marital authority over cadets, even in cases where no such authority ever legally existed under the monarchy). In Furstenberg, the Head had no authority to grant or withhold authorization to marriages of cadets, and GHdA cannot -- and does not purport -- to have conferred such authority on any dynastic Head. Lethiere 21:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Umlaut

The article needs to be consistent, from title to text to footnotes. Do we use the umlaut or not? She doesn't anymore, as a call to her office attests.Kitchawan 18:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prince and Princess

In Germany, nobility has been abolished for 90 years now. Members of noble houses can only "keep" a title as part of their last name. It's not a title anymore, so it cannot precede the complete name and it cannot be translated. Therefore it's Diane Prinzessin von Fürstenberg (where "Prinzessin von Fürstenberg" is the last name), not Prinzessin Diane von Fürstenberg (Princess = Prinzessin). The German Wikipedia article gets it right. I highly doubt that the Genealogisches Handbuch claims differently. It's the same for her former husband and her children.--134.130.4.242 (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While Germany no longer officially recognizes noble titles, the noble families still do. Her marriage was considered dynastic by the House of Furstenberg, and therefore, to the family, she was considered a princess at the time she was married to Egon. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Alexander (born six months after their wedding)

Seems needlessly petty and gossipy to point out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.81.186 (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parents

Her father was Romanian. That is clear enough. But was her mother Greek? I am not sure that "Nahmias" is a Greek name. What is the relevance of calling her a "Holocaust survivor". That does not define anyone, particularly their identity.203.184.41.226 (talk) 02:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nahmias is a Jewish name. She was a Greek Jew. And being the child of a survivor has defined her identity, as she has said, and as many children of survivors attest. -- 64.131.245.59 (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

End of marriage to the Prince?

The article says her first marriage ended in 1972, the infobox has 1983. (and the Prince's article says 1972) Can someone please verify?Naraht (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Net Worth

Forbes has here net worth at US$ 450 million (2015)[1]. Where could this be added?WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Kind Regards WEC[reply]

References

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Diane von Fürstenberg/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Beginnings of a good article about an important and influential designer. Daniel Case 17:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 13:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diane von Fürstenberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Diane von Fürstenberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Love Is life

Would love to work with her to spread the word 2601:584:C000:C60:80A4:15FA:1E8B:483F (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poor writing

The prose is poorly written, with sloppy syntax — not incoherent, but not up to standards. 72.76.14.54 (talk) 22:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]