Talk:Ecological classification
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
This is part of a WikiProject.
For optional guidelines on contributing see Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecoregions
Table of Terms
In the spirit of being BOLD, I added this complicated table of parallel terms for ecology space. Every one of these is attested by journal literature, but I lack the resources to find them all. Try googling for these words and they will be found -- it took me hours to verify that they exist. And, yes a geoelement is part of the plant group, not geology. Don't ask me why.... BeeTea 23:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if it's attested by journal literature then you shoudl cite each and every one of them; I'm particularly concred with the apparently-coined terms in the geology and physiographc columns, which are rare if exist at all in those discpilnes. It's all fine adn dandyc to ecology to go and coin such terms, but to claim that thae yare parallel classificatoins....well, tha'ts OR, and also POV; this appaers to be a WWF oriented classification system, but there are three or four others, also. "Physioregion" in real-world-speak is physiographic regino, for example; "georegion" is if anything a geographic region, not a geologic one, and so on.....Also, a lot of ecology articles read like manifestos, trying to lay out doctrine instead of explorign facts; or at least exploring definitions as laid out by those defining the field; it should only present such claims/defintiions as such, not speak of them as facts - especially when they impinge on terms used by other fields, or seek to supplant them....Skookum1 (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Unifying effort
I realize the idea of the original author is to support equivalent terms among several science fields regarding the aggregation levels and the size of the areas of the systems they study. I have a added some equivalent terms with a couple of references supporting them. Nevertheless, it is necessary to admit there is no consensus with all the other available sources. Maybe this work can help professionals on these fields to propose some kind of interdisciplinary world-wide effort to create a general framework. Because I think it is self-evident there is a real need about such a thing. I teach a general Science course and I can tell I am having a hard time trying to unify these similar concepts across several fields. George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Moved comment from the article page
"not related to a table article, an agenda for an environment-ecology article----A crucial concept of land classification, is that each of the areas defined either remains the same over a certain period of time or shows a slow gradual change, without large, sudden changes. This means it is a system in a kind of equilibrium. It postulates an area is an
Moved section from the article page
Moved section with dubious terms (neologisms?) that must be checked.
Ecology
In ecology:[citation needed]
- ecosphere
- ecozone
- ecoprovince
- ecoregion
- ecodistrict
- ecosection
- ecosite
- ecotope (ecosystem sensu stricto?)[citation needed]
- ecosite
- ecosection
- ecodistrict
- ecoregion
- ecoprovince
- ecozone
Biogeography
In biogeography:[citation needed]
Zoogeography
In zoogeography:[citation needed]
Phytogeography
In phytogeography:[citation needed]
- phytosphere
- floristic kingdom
- floristic region
- floristic province
For the physiognomic approach, see Vegetation#Classifications.
For the assoociation (phytosociological) approach, see Phytosociology#Classificatory traditions.
Physiography
In
Geology
In Geology:[citation needed]
Pedology
In pedology:[citation needed]
Climatology
Köppen (1884)
- Main climate group, 5 groups, 1st letter
- Type of precipitation pattern, 2nd letter
- Subtype, degree of summer heat, 3rd letter
- Type of precipitation pattern, 2nd letter
References
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061001180834/http://srmwww.gov.bc.ca/ecology/ecoregions/index.html to http://srmwww.gov.bc.ca/ecology/ecoregions/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Differences between closed and open vegetation
differences between closed and open vegetation 196.108.156.34 (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)