Talk:Edith Nourse Rogers

A fact from Edith Nourse Rogers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 February 2005. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that U.S. Congress? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/February.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group. Maine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts. U.S. Congress This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events". Military history: World War II C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  World War II task force Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

removed the phrase less admiraly when describing Congresswoman Nourse-Rogers' support of the House Committee on un-American activities. This is not neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.122.124 (talk • contribs)

Maybe it's just me, but this article doesn't seem to be very wiki. That is, sections of it (the WAAC and post-WWII sections in particular) read more like a college essay about Rep. Rogers' peripheral involvement in giving women equality in the U.S. military. And the bit about "wanting to kick the UN out of its headquarters in NYC" (I'm paraphrasing, of course) isn't that formal of a statement.

Furthermore, I almost added a {{unreferenced}} tag, as there are no footnotes (or similar citations) throughout the article … yet there is a "References" section of books and so on. So perhaps a {{unreferenced}} tag isn't appropriate. Still, it does seem like it's lacking something. Thoughts? —Micahbrwn (talk) 18:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think I found the right tag to use … {{Nofootnotes|article}} seems to be appropriate, yeah? Okay, then! —Micahbrwn (talk) 06:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edith Nourse Rogers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100729213804/http://www.history.army.mil/books/wac/index.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/books/wac/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edith Nourse Rogers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050526084745/http%3A//www.visn1.med.va.gov/bedford/ to http://www.visn1.med.va.gov/bedford/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]