Talk:Elizabeth Timothy
Elizabeth Timothy was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 17, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Elizabeth Timothy was the first female publisher of a newspaper in America? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Possible Sources
I can't get ahold of it on my current connection, but this article looks promising as a source here.
Question as to intent
Does the line , "The South Carolina Gazette newspaper of 4 January 1739 is a work contributed to Timothy:", mean to use the word "attributed" rather than "contributed"? --Khe Sanh vet (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you. Corrected!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth Timothy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202230755/http://www.knowitall.org/legacy/laureates/Elizabeth%20Timothy.html to http://www.knowitall.org/legacy/laureates/Elizabeth%20Timothy.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214154506/http://www.halseymap.com/Flash/window.asp?HMID=37 to http://www.halseymap.com/flash/window.asp?HMID=37
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Timothy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924014312/http://www.fofweb.com/History/HistRefMain.asp?iPin=WBL120&SID=2&DatabaseName=American+History+Online&InputText=%22Elizabeth+Timothy%22&SearchStyle=&dTitle=Timothy%2C+Elizabeth&TabRecordType=Biography&BioCountPass=1&SubCountPass=0&DocCountPass=0&ImgCountPass=0&MapCountPass=0&FedCountPass=&MedCountPass=0&NewsCountPass=0&RecPosition=1&AmericanData=Set&WomenData=&AFHCData=&IndianData=&WorldData=&AncientData=&GovernmentData= to http://www.fofweb.com/History/HistRefMain.asp?iPin=WBL120&SID=2&DatabaseName=American+History+Online&InputText=%22Elizabeth+Timothy%22&SearchStyle=&dTitle=Timothy%2C+Elizabeth&TabRecordType=Biography&BioCountPass=1&SubCountPass=0&DocCountPass=0&ImgCountPass=0&MapCountPass=0&FedCountPass=&MedCountPass=0&NewsCountPass=0&RecPosition=1&AmericanData=Set&WomenData=&AFHCData=&IndianData=&WorldData=&AncientData=&GovernmentData=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Elizabeth Timothy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 05:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. I hope to complete the review over the next couple of days. Ganesha811 (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking this on, Ganesha811. Doug is recovering from a broken shoulder and probably won't be able to respond for a while. I will be available to address your points in the meantime. — The Most Comfortable Chair 19:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- @The Most Comfortable Chair: Thanks for responding to this. See User_talk:Ganesha811#Elizabeth_Timothy_GAN. Ganesha811 will probably be reviewing other printer/publishers as well and just be backlogging all of them to when I can respond. I should be able to start responding to reviews in the first week of Janurary of 2022. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- @The Most Comfortable Chair:, @Doug Coldwell: this article is just about ready to pass (see two minor points below). Happy to pass now after these quick changes, or wait till January as previously discussed. Happy Christmas! Ganesha811 (talk) 23:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your edits and the review. I have implemented your suggestions. Happy Christmas to you too! — The Most Comfortable Chair 05:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- This article passes! Congrats to anyone who worked on it - I'll do the needful now. Ganesha811 (talk) 06:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your edits and the review. I have implemented your suggestions. Happy Christmas to you too! — The Most Comfortable Chair 05:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the list incorporation .
|
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline .
|
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as audio :
| ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions .
|
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
Copyright problem removed
For
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
This article is part of