Talk:Ernst Lubitsch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Influences

Some mention should be made of

McDogm 02:53, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply
]

Per debate and discussion re: assessment of the approximate 100 top priority articles of the project, this article has been included as a top priority article. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this follow the rules?

To me, this well written and verifiable article demonstrates that which is not officially approved under the Wickifying rules, which tells us what makes an encyclopedia, for it breaks most of them. What, no refs? No links? No templates? NPOV? No proof that what it says is true? Nonetheless, there is room for this kind of treatment. To be or not to be, that is the question. I vote for let it be. Protect it. It is what makes Wikipedia the great encyclopedia that it can be. JohnClarknew (talk) 15:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


What is the source of the David Thomson quote?Zamboni54 (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This not correct

"With glowing reviews under his belt, and American money flowing his way, Lubitsch formed his own production company and set to work on the high-budget spectacular The Loves of Pharoah (One Arabian Night, 1921)."

Sumurun (aka One Arabian Night) and Weib der Pharao are different films. Luckily, only the latter is lost.

--- Uncle JG —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.108.19 (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---> No, this is not correct: "Das Weib des Pharao" is not lost. I have seen the film last year. my regards 84.60.156.59 (talk) 19:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wrong link

"So this is Paris" links to a different film from 1955! my regards 84.60.156.59 (talk) 19:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Years Active vs. Years Alive

In the infobox, Lubitsch's "Years Active" extend a year beyond his death. Lubitsch was awesome, but not that awesome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholasdunham (talkcontribs) 18:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Circumstances of death

Is it true that he died on the casting couch? Valetude (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Casting couch", with its implications of duress or traded favors, is not supported by the sources of which I am aware. A few biographers do report that Lubitsch died in the company of a woman, but her relationship to Lubitsch is unsettled. According to Scott Eyman in Ernst Lubitsch: Laughter in Paradise, she was "his latest casual amour", "neither an actress nor a prostitute". [1] On the other hand, Maurice Zolotow's Billy Wilder in Hollywood reports Wilder's anecdote that the chauffeur had to pay off the woman because Lubitsch had died after sex and before paying her fee. [2] --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Well, a rumour answered with citations of other rumours and 'anecdotes'... The rumour about a woman connected with his death is after 67 years still a rumour, no proof or witness' statement until today. According to what I read in the last 20 years about him (mostly German sources but a few English, too) is is only safe that he was found dead by his driver Otto Werner. VINCENZO1492 09:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ernst Lubitsch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]