Talk:Eugene Landy

Eugene Landy has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 18, 2017. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rock music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia articles

	Disability
Eugene Landy is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

I'm not sure what this agency is or was. I looked for it on the web and could not find a clear answer. It can't be the Medical Board of California which regulates medical doctors, which Landy was not. Thus, he would not have had authority to write prescriptions in the first place. Currently clinical psychologists are regulated by the California Board of Psychology. Perhaps this is a defunct agency that had jurisdiction over psychologists at the time.Tom Cod (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any photographs of him during the Wilson years that could be used? Dr Feelgood is a very notable person, an open license photo of him with Wilson would be perfect. 115.166.32.231 (talk) 10:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Eugene Landy/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Shearonink (talk · contribs) 00:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to Review this article for possible GA status. Shearonink (talk) 00:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This Review is On Hold until the issue pointed out by the citation needed template - "He frequently employed Gestalt therapy in his treatment technique" - sourced. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   What a sad sad story - well-written article, lays out all the facts. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   B. It complies with the

   list incorporation

   :

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with

   the layout style guideline

   :

   B. All

   reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

   :

   Ref #8/(Obituary)independent.co.uk has gone dead.

   There is a "citation needed" template. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   @Ilovetopaint: The unsourced statement should be removed completely. Ref #2/the obituary from The Independent has gone dead. Shearonink (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   @Ilovetopaint: The obituary from The Independent has gone stale. It must be removed - surely there is another Landy obituary you could use. Shearonink (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Why did you hide the Gestalt therapy statement? It should either be removed completely or sourced & kept. Shearonink (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   Ran the copyvio tool - no problems found. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

   Not a hatchet job/attack page, sticks to the facts about this individual. Shearonink (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing

   edit war

   or content dispute:

   No edit-warring. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are

   copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

   :

   Both images have the proper permissions. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   B. Images are

   suitable captions

   :

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This Review is On Hold until the above issues are corrected/adjusted. Shearonink (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Congratulations - it's a GA, all the various issues raised in the course of this Review have been adjusted/corrected. Shearonink (talk) 06:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I missed the ref suggestion - sorry - and addressed all the issues raised. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Landy's name has been removed from the credits on a lot of the Wilson songs he was formerly credited on. Are there any good sources on this? - David Gerard (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]