Talk:Feuillant (political group)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance). France Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is not a copyright infringement. The linked site is a mirror site. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the Template:Infobox political party should be removed from this article. At least all parameters that are anachronistic and/or contain unverifiable information should be deleted. My arguments stated at Talk:Jacobin#Infobox apply to this case too. The discussion for both cases should be concerted there. --RJFF (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like they are the most right-wing of a very left-wing organization. In the original Estates General, the most diverse representation of France's political views (as contrasted with the later purged assemblies/conventions) they absolutely were on the left. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.201.219.221 (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]