Talk:First inauguration of George Washington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Wrong Scripture

The text says that the Bible was flipped to Deuteronomy 28, when the source says Genesis 49:13. I'm going to change it.

talk) 23:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on First inauguration of George Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

To anyone concerned:   It is proposed that

meet all requirements for merging. There has been no significant additions made to these articles for well over a year. If interested please see the discussion on the Presidency of George Washington Talk page, making any related comments on that Talk page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose the merger: there are specific pages describing the inaugurations of every other US president. Also, this page contains relevant historical data on the inauguration of the first president and on the events preceeding the inauguration and related to the beginning of the operations of the new US government under the Constitution. Antonio Basto (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@
Other stuff exists was already addressed in the discussion to merge and is not much of a reason to have yet another article on the inauguration. If there were items missing in the main GW presidency article you simply should have moved/added them there. We should revert back, as you are going against a clear consensus. You really should have looked into this matter further and discussed this before reverting back. If need be we can call everyone back (@Rjensen, Orser67, Drdpw, Shearonink, The Man in Question, and TheVirginiaHistorian:) and have the same discussion all over again. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
WP:MR), this discussion should have taken place (per W:MR) 1)At the closer's talk page and, then, 2)if the discussion fails there then the issue should have been posted/continued further at Wikipedia:Move review - however, I do think the previous merge proposal & subsequent move was not incorrect. Shearonink (talk) 21:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
]