Talk:Gerhard Domagk

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physiology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

An image used in this article, File:Dr G Domagk.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 11:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerhard Domagk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202025710/http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/nobelprize_facts.html to http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/nobelprize_facts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn’t every instance of “antibiotic” in this article be replaced with “antimicrobial” since Prontosil is synthesized and antibiotics are organic? The Prontosil article even calls it an antimicrobial in the first line Ryryjs (talk) 17:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, but not really. Synthetic drugs (

oxazolidinones) are all referred to as antibiotics. We have passed the classical-definition age. Chhandama (talk) 04:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

However, many other sites indicate that she was six years old at the time of her injury. For instance https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/gerhard-domagk

Was this girl, who can be considered as the first human person cured by an antibiotic, 4 years or 6 years old when her father saved her with a sulfamide antibacterial drug ? Pierre Briozzo (talk) 11:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very good point. Corrected in the article. Chhandama (talk) 04:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great ! 2A01:E0A:1B2:3C10:78AC:50A7:F5E2:3EA3 (talk) 08:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]