Talk:Gompa

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Surely 'Gompa' is the most common English spelling?--Michig (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a known concept in English? With a search, I found some result about Tibetan Buddhism while some result irrelated. ––虞海 (Yú Hǎi) ✍ 10:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same comment as Michig. I tried to move the page back to the original title (Gompa), but was afraid to make a mistake. Maybe some senior editor can help.--Pseudois (talk) 18:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gompa is the standard name in English. Yu Hai is a disruptive editor with a long history of unilateral and controversial moves. The page should be moved back to Gompa as soon as possible. BabelStone (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this page has now had the same misfortune as Shishapangma (now

Xixabangma). If you really want to get this page back to Gompa, don't make the same mistake we made at Shishapagma. Get an admin to move it back now...before placing a requested move template. Once a requested move discussion is initiated, you will never get it back to Gompa without a consensus and Yu Hai, as you have both pointed out, is not interested in reaching consensus.--Racerx11 (talk) 23:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I looked at the history of this and moved Goinba back to Gompa for you all hoping that you all can work things out with 虞海. --Mike Cline (talk) 12:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mike, your work here is greatly appreciated.--Racerx11 (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gompa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905113025/http://www.rangan-datta.info/index.htm to http://www.rangan-datta.info/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100401064418/http://wanderingscapes.com/blog/ to http://www.wanderingscapes.com/blog

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]