Talk:Grace Glueck

A news item involving Grace Glueck was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 October 2022.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Grace Glueck appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a 1969 note from New York Times writer Grace Glueck to Arthur Ochs Sulzberger spurred a class-action lawsuit over gender discrimination?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grace Glueck.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Grace Glueck was given her own art column in The New York Times after she found an image of a lolita to go with a review of Lolita? Source: The New York Times
- ALT1: ... that Grace Glueck's note to Arthur Ochs Sulzberger asking why no women were promoted to the top editorial positions at The New York Times in 1969 spurred a class-action lawsuit? Source: The New York Times
- Reviewed: William S. Messervy
- Comment: Eligible per Rule 1d, because it is only appeared in the "Recent Deaths" section of ITN and not as a bold link.

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting life, on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. Thank you for a good expansion. I prefer ALT1, because lolita is not an article good enough for the Main page. ALT1 is also more to the point of her influence. Why not link the paper? Why no infobox? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]