Talk:Granite dome

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Mid‑importance Talk:Granite dome is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Half Dome was not really 'glacier-sliced,' see http://www.yosemite.org/visitor/frequent-geology.htm. I don't have a more authoritative source, but it should be possible to dig one up. 171.66.39.105 00:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are gobs of

I moved the images to a gallery at the bottom of the page. This looks better.Cyberia23 (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would there be any objections to making "Exfoliation dome" the primary entry for this article. Exfoliation dome is used much more widely, can be used to describe similar features in other types of rock, and is the best explanation for the geomorphology seen in the Yosemite Valley. Although the term "granite dome" does exists, it has fallen out of use and was replaced (by the original author) with the term "desert dome" to describe rounded masses of rock formed by prolonged exposure to desert climates (which is not the case with Half Dome). Rygel, M.C. (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to Wikipedia. Would this page be the kind of page I can use as a reference for granite: http://designskitchen.co.za/benefits-of-granite-kitchen-countertops.html. Please help. Thanks KarlKarlstadler (talk) 19:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As that is a commercial website, I would think not. Commercial websites are typically designed to promote their product and make a sale (see the "Get a quote" link on the page) and not to provide unbiased information. Fails WP:reliable sources. Vsmith (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Vsmith - such a reference would almost invariably be construed as link-spam and reverted.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   17:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to recall much was made of glacial action in the formation of Half Dome (& the Glacier Apron) when I visited Yosemite, yet there is no mention of that here - why? Also, I disagree with the first post above, you can't have too many images of Yosemite! ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.5.155 (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Granite dome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060904035334/http://www.fettes.com/Cairngorms/dome.htm to http://www.fettes.com/cairngorms/dome.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]