Talk:Grenada dove

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. Grenada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Grenada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Grenada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GrenadaWikipedia:WikiProject GrenadaTemplate:WikiProject GrenadaGrenada articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following The current uproar over development of the Mount Sanctuary is misplaced and misleading. The Grenada Dove is not adequately protected under current management plans. Funding and properly arranged conservation easements with money-generating entities such as resorts not only provide protection but also increase the opportunity for tourism within the Grenadian economy. Conservation efforts for this species will only work when the needs of all stakeholders are addressed. If the Grenada Dove is to continue to exist then individuals involved in its conservation must reevaluate current methods of preserving this species, stop perpetuating inaccurate data about the species, and seek alternatives that are win-win for both the Grenada Dove and the Grenadian people is not neutral or unbiased and reads like a press statement from the developers. This article has undergone numerous edits from anonymous IPs from both sides of the debate. Wikipedia is not a battleground or a soapbox. There seems to be a lot of info that has been added to this and that is great but we need to make this article neutral and balanced. Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many statements in the 'current issues' section need proper referencing as well as neutralising the tendentious language. There are also inline references throughout the article that are not expanded or mentioned in the list of references. Maias 06:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some blatantly POV statements but it still needs plenty of work. Maias 10:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grenada dove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711130021/http://www.grenadadovecampaign.com/Images/MYSTERIOUS-ENVIRONMENTAL-ASSESSMENT.pdf to http://www.grenadadovecampaign.com/Images/MYSTERIOUS-ENVIRONMENTAL-ASSESSMENT.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]