Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests
related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the
Arbitration enforcement
noticeboard.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
Untitled
Hi Zcaky,
I'll pick up here where I left off ;-) I changed back the first sentence for reasons of grammar; I included the cooperation in the next line. Cheers, TewfikTalk 02:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On the strength of Ian's Times reference, I've changed the dead back to 41. TewfikTalk 06:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Palestine Post reported 39, and continued to report 39 for at least 2 months afterwards. For example on Feb 20, 1948 it summarised the report of a Jewish commission of enquiry on the incident; it repeatedly gives the death toll as 39. I guess that the difference between 39 and 41 might be some people who died of their injuries at some later date, but unless the Times explains where they got the 41 from I think we should take the PP as more authoritative. In addition, Morris, Righteous Victims (and also Birth..Revisted), and Milstein, History of Israel's War of Independence, Vol II, both say 39. I think this is enough evidence to adopt 39 in the article. --Zerotalk 13:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ian said that both 31 December 1947 and 2 January 1948 stories in the Times record 41. Perhaps you can take this up with him directly, but it seems that if two more died after the fact, then those reports are a reliable indication of that. TewfikTalk 17:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If the Times actually says "two more died later of their injuries", then that can be accepted, but if they just say "41 were killed" without explaining why they don't agree with the common count, then that isn't enough. Newspapers make mistakes all the time. The Palestine Post gave 39 almost every time they mentioned the incident over the next two months, and more importantly the Jewish Agency enquiry report says 39. That enquiry result by itself is more authoritative than the newspaper reports. Milstein cites the 39 figure to a Haganah internal report on the event. --Zerotalk 00:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The sources in the region and the scholarly sources are more authoritative but perhaps we can just refer to the figure of 41 and its sources to inform readers and to prevent a recurrence of this debate. --Ian Pitchford 07:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In such cases, on fr, we chose to write : "(...) between 39
The massacre really involves the first 6 Arabs, the 41/39 Jews and the later 70 (or couple dozen according to some sources) of Arabs. Can the lead be amended to take into account that many were the victims of the massacre, it was not just one ethnic group that suffered? --Abnn 06:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also I notice that the actual events were more involved as described here http://www.mideastweb.org/refriots.htm then the article current details. Thus this article could be expanded to capture the richness of the history at some point. --Abnn 06:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Terrible - no context
I heard about what happened at the Haifa Oil Refinery from my mother's uncle, who was working there the day the
Balad al-Shaykh, who would line up outside in the hope of finding work. He told me about how the Arab workers inside the refinery exploded with rage, grabbing whatever they could their hands on to attack the British and Jewish managers who had better positions and earned more money while the native Arab population had to make to with the slop work. He himself had no stomach for blood and locked himself in a room with two other guys from Nazareth until the hubbub died down. Anyway, I wish he had written a book on the subject so that I could use it as a source here. I'll try to find other such sources though, because the article as currently written is confused. Tiamuttalk 17:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Massacre? Reliable sources?
Are they any reliable sources that call this a "massacre"? Normally, I would not mind, but recently at
Balad al-Shaykh raid since, even though it involved the deaths of innocent civilians, sources explicitly calling it a massacre were few and far between. On what basis is this attack being characterized as such? Tiamuttalk 14:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Benny Morris, 1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War, pp.405 says the Palestian Arab committed two big massacres during the 1948 War and cite this as one of them. Ceedjee (talk) 14:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]