Talk:Jacobean era

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. European history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this really the Hebrew translation? It's my understanding that this is actually the Latin translation (from Jacobus). —Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanWB (talk • contribs) 04:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't this mainly English? I note the not one of the works mentioned is Scottish. Norvo (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I note Macbeth is given the date of 1603 for composition: since most scholars place it between 1603-1606, with some believing it makes direct reference to the Gunpowder plot of 1605, can we at least hedge it, i.e. 1603-1606?Kaiguy (talk) 06:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jacobean era. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071129183115/http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/history/pdf/sci_and_pat.pdf to http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/history/pdf/Sci_and_Pat.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080121154306/http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fah/history/research/sci_and_pat.htm to http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fah/history/research/sci_and_pat.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

his Society of section 106.215.172.168 (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the etymology section completely removed in 2017 by the extensive edits by user Rjensen? For someone looking to learn more, this could be the page that points out why the era is in fact called "Jacobean" given the name Jacob/Jacobus doesn't otherwise appear at all on the page nor on James VI and I. Such things shouldn't be assumed to be common knowledge. --121.6.154.151 (talk) 17:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]