Talk:Johanna Quaas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Johanna Quaas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: by SL93 (talk) 02:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Johanna Quaas 2017 in Halle (Saale)
Johanna Quaas 2017 in Halle (Saale)

5x expanded by Eewilson (talk). Self-nominated at 01:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi there. I will review this DYK. I elect for ALT1. The article was sufficiently expanded. The hook was confirmed by a reliable source. No QPQ cause this is still your 4th nomination. Length is 175 characters so it is within the hook criteria. No copyright violations with the photo. Trillfendi (talk) 06:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi, thanks! I appreciate your time and comments. ALT1 is my favorite and may be the most interesting, with two additional links, skydiving and Elizabeth II, to hook someone. Eewilson (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Trillfendi Is there anything I need to do before it goes from a grey check to a green check? That part is a bit confusing. If so, let me know. Thank you again for your time. Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

What is the purpose of all the {{lang}} formatting around foreign cities and names? Where is the policy or guideline that says this should be included? I have been editing for 16 years and have never seen this before. GiantSnowman 13:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GiantSnowman, and thanks for commenting. You are likely much more familiar with the MOS and other guidelines than I am, so if there is a reason they shouldn't be there, I'm open to hearing it. They were tedious to add. This was my first update to an article containing text with many non-English words, so I tried to understand what was expected and read about the template. Template:Lang#Rationale explains the reasons succinctly, with a link to expansion in other areas of the MOS. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 13:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is what I mean - I am unaware of any guidance/policy that says they should be used, and I have never seen them before. I suggest they are removed as per my edit. GiantSnowman 13:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:FOREIGNITALIC applies - it is italics for actual foreign words, not places or people's names like you have added. GiantSnowman 13:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Correct. They should not be italicized which is why the italics parameter was set to no. However, they should still be marked as foreign words. Do you need me to spell out the reasons here from the MOS? – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 13:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, they should not. This is why in the example at MOS:FOREIGNITALIC 'Gustav I of Sweden' is not marked as 'foreign'. GiantSnowman 14:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that example, 'Gustav I of Sweden' is not a non-English word or term, but knäckebröd and messmör are. Here are just five examples from the Johanna Quaas article that are non-English words with non-English pronunciations making the use of Template:Lang appropriate. There are many more.

  • Geißler
  • Hannchen
  • Turn-Oma
  • Hohenmölsen
  • Landes-Seniorenspiele

I'm not sure what you are not understanding. Are you objecting to the use of the lang template? Do you not understand its rational? When you made that edit, you removed everything related to handling non-English words within the article. Everything that could enable the pronunciation of the words for the visually-impaired was removed when you removed the lang templates. Please explain other than, "I am unaware of any guidance/policy that says they should be used, and I have never seen them before." I have now pointed you to the link to the rationale of the Lang template. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 14:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop speaking to me like I am an idiot and/or child. If you accept that "'Gustav I of Sweden' is not a non-English word or term", why did you add the lang template to names (including Geißler) and places throughout this article? GiantSnowman 14:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
GiantSnowman, how about we take a break from this and come back to it another time? – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, this needs resolving now. Please explain why names in 'Gustav I of Sweden' do not need a lang template but names in this article do... GiantSnowman 14:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion is to restore my edit and then discuss which specific words you believe need the lang template. GiantSnowman 14:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]