Talk:John C. Lilly

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John C. Lilly article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as High-importance). defunct .Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

United States: Dartmouth Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire - Dartmouth College (assessed as Low-importance).

Neuroscience Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

The contents of the Human biocomputer page were its talk page .

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John C. Lilly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111110212808/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_7119/is_200803/ai_n32264929/ to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_7119/is_200803/ai_n32264929/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lol MKUltra to the core wake up sheeple — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.251.28 (talk) 11:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that it's a lucid detail of his life and its relevance to his work is minor. But to a lot of people, this is the guy who funded and hired a woman who masturbated a dolphin for science. To not mention this at all seems like deliberate whitewashing. 80.43.80.141 (talk) 14:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would we duplicate the material at Margaret Howe Lovatt? What she did or didn't do gets described in her article. It would be off-topic here. This is not a "whitewash", it's called "staying on topic". Skyerise (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]