Talk:Joshua Fishman

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Jewish culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Languages Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Pennsylvania Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Philadelphia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance). project's importance scale .

omg, this is the awesomest thing I’ve ever heard of! but has does anyone else know this story? I can’t find it mentioned anywhere on the Web except here. —Wiki Wikardo 01:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Wikardo, you put your finger on the problem of the whole article- verifiability. Which is why I flagged it today. Someone even (!) reverted my ^{[page needed]} tags, thinking tossing a book under the sources section automatically sources anything folks jot down here. Now that this man has passed, he deserves a good article. --Wuerzele (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ofelia Garcia mentioned it in an obituary she circulated. I have heard/seen him say it on a video of a conference presentation in the UK. By the way, a number of the page tags were attached to long titles that may have not been obvious as book titles, but they were. We have all lost a great man. Peace to all of us who are left to mourn him. Pete unseth (talk) 19:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I now understand what you were looking for when you flagged something for page numbers. I thought you simply meant you wanted the pages of an article within a book. But now I think you are looking for relevant pages in a whole book. When a whole volume is dedicated to Fishman, citing the "relevant" pages would be a challenge. Or have I still misunderstood you? Seeking peace and appropriately relevant and complete source info. Pete unseth (talk) 19:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad you see the challenge. Any claim made on the page

text–source integrity

to a linguist ?

This essential discussion per

WP:BRD = your onus to discuss, belongs on the talk:Joshua Fishman page, Pete unseth ! I will move it there. BTW I already started discussing the problems this article has, you didnt look. --Wuerzele (talk) 19:22, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

A fact can be verifiable without specific page numbers, for example if the point supported is the main topic of the cited work and therefore not found on a specific page but in the totality of the cited work.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 19:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]