This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
a policy of not calling people or groups "terrorist". This is not an indication of condoning "terrorist" activities, but of neutrality, and avoidance of passing judgment, affirming or denying. Please debate the merit of this policy at WT:Words to avoid
John Moe (2011-05-02). "For bin Laden news, it's not Twitter's moment, it's Wikipedia's". American Public Media. Archived from the original on 2011-06-16. Retrieved 2011-05-03. I read the Wikipedia page about the attack and it was comprehensive. Wikipedia gets slammed sometimes for being unreliable and a place where any yahoo can alter reality to anything they like. The page about the attack is extensive, well sourced, and incredibly informative.... In high profile cases like this, these pages are being extensively edited and also extensively policed. Good stuff.
Department of War Studies, KCL. Archived from the original
on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2011-05-09. So the man's dead. Quite an event. As Europeans are waking up and catching up with the big news, one question is: who's got the best coverage? Believe it or not, but Wikipedia is one of the candidates. In less than five hours and in an impressive 400 edits, a dedicated team of self-appointed authors and editors has come up with a pretty good (and protected) article.
This article was nominated for
Reactions to the death of Osama bin Laden on 2 May 2011. The result of the discussion was to not merge.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
British Special Boat Service was involved in the killing of Osama bin Laden? Parham wiki (talk) 09:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi User:Parham wiki. Disclaimer, I have no special knowledge on this topic. The Daily Express, while not a reliable source, says here: "[...] when US Navy Seals stormed Bin Laden’s lair last week [two SBS officers'] top secret role has been described as crucial for the success of the mission. [...] Britain’s SBS officers were involved in the briefings prior to the attack." Given this is a special forces matter, it is unlikely anyone official will confirm SBS involvement. But, assuming the article is correct, and the men did not act on their own responsibility, the SBS was indeed involved in the killing insofar as they helped with the preparation. --2001:1C06:19CA:D600:AFEF:A9F7:EA5:1764 (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I scrolled through the page and noticed two templates, unrelated to this whole article. They're about ESPN and MLB or something. 2601:445:601:82E0:B5C5:2A68:7895:6502 (talk) 06:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Spam can be removed at will. — LlywelynII 12:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So... did the repatriated widows ever talk to anyone?
Two bizarre articles (one focused on herbal viagra) seem to suggest they did but it isn't clarified or sourced to the original (presumably Yemeni or Arabic) accounts. It would be valuable to know what they claim, given how patently false the initial US accounts were and how cravenly self-serving some of the subsequent SEAL accounts have been. OBL not having the guns nearby or loaded but still attempting to reach for one in the moment makes no sense at all unless the helicopters and grenades were somehow magically silent at a distance of a few hundred meters. He had to have been either bedridden, attempting to surrender, or cowering in an entirely different room from the weapons.
Strange that no one on the English internet (per vanilla Google) seems to have even hunted down the widows' accounts. Even stranger we haven't, per the 5 pages of archived discussion. — LlywelynII 12:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Soooo… the date is wrong
Osama Bin Laden was killed on May 1, 2011 Not on May 2. Hamster7852 (talk) 08:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}