Talk:LACM 149371

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mammals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This review is

transcluded from Talk:LACM 149371/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Comments in a couple of days. Sasata (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This will be the last isolated tooth for a while. Ucucha 19:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not much to say here, the article reads well.

• date ranges for geological times in the lead
  • Done.
• might want to mention in the lead that the tooth's size is only millimetres
  • Done.
• enamel prism?
  • Explained.
• anything useful in this?
  • Much on rodents; nothing on this thing. He doesn't even cite Goin et al. (2004).

Sasata (talk) 02:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Ucucha 03:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meets GA criteria, passing now. Sasata (talk) 03:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]