Talk:Leslie McGrath

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Not to be deleted

Hi this article seems to have been nominated for deletion by someone saying that it doesnt meet relevant 'notability guidelines'. However, as I see it, it does cite some reliable basic references as required for BLPs and thus, should not be deleted- indeed, shouldnt be nominated at all for deletion. I think that more and better references can be added later by editors or the subject, if possible. Meanwhile, I am removing the 'delete article' template. Best wishes, 39.54.252.106 (talk) 16:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)O . Khan , Islamabad, Pakistan[reply]

Hi--totally agree. I added some citations, but the original flagging of this article seems unfounded. The original already proved McGrath's contributions via significant publications and community work. If the identity of the flagger can be traced and his/her activities monitored, I suggest doing so. ˜˜˜˜Sophia, US — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skrolik (talkcontribs) 01:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leslie McGrath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]