Talk:List of birdwatchers

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Birds Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Somebody wrote that Hugh Buck has a list of 9530 species citing surfbird.com as the source. That source says 9468, so where do those 9530 come from? Is it an error or does it come from another source?

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of birdwatchers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081025010441/http://champagne-ardenne.lpo.fr/cocheurs/index.htm to http://champagne-ardenne.lpo.fr/cocheurs/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110619014418/http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Publications/ZooGoer/2005/3/books34_3.cfm to http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Publications/ZooGoer/2005/3/books34_3.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first and primary source reference given is surfbirds.com. This site is simply a place where birdwatchers can state the number of species seen in various categories. There is no verification, no species lists, no sources, simply the birder’s own claim. While the great majority, I am sure, are honest and valid, there is nothing to prevent a fake claim. As such, I question its usefulness. (And yes, I’m in there too!)Ptilinopus (talk) 10:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is no single birdwatcher in the world that has an external checker of their lists (maybe with the exception of kids below 13). It makes little sense to say that sources should not be own claims, because there is no other possible source. It goes with the hobby. If you decide not to trust own claims then birdwatching is not your thing, try chess or numismatics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salvadorcases (talk • contribs) 23:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's this about Julie Cook having seen more than 9000 species? Can somebody fix it? I'm on mobile and I don't understand the interface good enough to reverse such a large defacing of a page. Bogfind (talk) 18:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article suggests that this is a list of notable birdwatchers, to which per

, a separate article is required. I propose that the people without separate articles with large life lists be deleted and replaced with a section on notable people with large life lists. There should also be a section on notable birdwatchers who are best known for being birdwatchers, yet do not have large life lists. Does anyone have any views on this? User:AustinRedd007 —Preceding undated comment added 16:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

90% of the people listed have no source cited showing, independently, that they are birders! Bad article! --plaws (talk) 16:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Every one of the 'Birdwatchers famous for achievements in other fields' should have a citation that supports their inclusion. For all we know this list is being added to every time someone sees "So-and-so liked to sit at the beach and watch the gulls over the water." I propose to remove every uncited inclusion. Valereee (talk) 13:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simply mentioning this because it might help us figure out what we're looking for. There's actually an interesting comment at a nature preserve's site: https://www.lowerbrucklandfarm.co.uk/birds-and-birding/famous-birdwatchers/:

There are a number of sites that have obviously been paid to refer to Prince Philip, Paul McCartney and Daryl Hannah as birdwatchers. Hannah does get involved in activist-type stuff, but I can’t find any evidence of her donning a decent pair of binoculars.

Hannah was namedropped in the Guardian article in 2008. We added her here along with the other celebrities namedropped in the same article. Since then she's appeared on multiple lists of birdwatching celebrities, and I'm wondering if those sources are pulling that information from us. Do we have any actual evidence of anyone discussing her interest in birdwatching, or is it all just bare mention namedrops? Has she ever called herself a birdwatcher? Ditto the others. If feel like if someone is actually a birdwatcher, we'll have discussion of it somewhere rather than a simple mention. Valereee (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These seems to be all sourced to self-reported databases. We need to see someone else talking about these people with large life lists. Valereee (talk) 13:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also don't think we need to update this bird-by-bird. 'Birders with life lists over 9000', with citation to some reliable non-self-reported-db source. Valereee (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This needs sources, too. Literally the first one I checked, James Clements, doesn't actually even mention birdwatching in the bio. I'm sure many ornithologists (and in particular the author of a checklist) probably are birdwatchers, but we need sources calling them something like "notable birdwatchers". Valereee (talk) 13:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]